Skip links

Main navigation

Russia Hack

Archives for May 2017

Top 10 Reasons Putin Wanted Trump To Lose To Hillary Clinton

by

Putin wanted Trump to lose. Here’s why:

(1)  Blackmail Bonanza

  • The Russian hack of Hillary’s private server gave Putin the mother lode of material with which to blackmail the U.S. in the event of a Clinton win. Alas, the 30,000 “missing” e-mails in Vlad’s possession left him with a pyrrhic victory when his gal lost.

(2)  Hillary Clinton’s Proven Corruptibility

  • As Secretary of State, Clinton signed off on Russia’s acquisition of 20% of U.S. uranium supplies in exchange for $140 million in Clinton Foundation donations, and a $500,000 gift for Bill. Seems strange that the Russians would throw such wealth at a candidate they allegedly opposed.
  • John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager, sat alongside two Russian oligarchs on the board of Joule Energy, which received $35 million from the state-owned Russian bank Sberbank. Podesta’s brother is that bank’s lobbyist. Joule Energy has raised $200 million from “investors” but produces no product. The oligarchs on Joule’s board were personal associates of Putin.
    • John Podesta did not disclose his involvement with the Russian government as required when he joined the Obama administration as senior advisor. And then Hillary made Podesta her campaign manager. And then she lost. And then she blamed Putin, whose personal friends used the Russian Central Bank to make her campaign manager rich. Easy!

(3)  Trump’s Energy Policy A Mortal Threat To Russian Economy

(4)  Trump Will Rebuild The Military That Hillary’s Party Decimated

  • Donald Trump’s plan to revitalize the American military cannot be welcome news to a country once brought down by the Reagan-era build-up. Surely, Vladimir was not anxious to see the modernization of America’s nuclear arsenal and naval fleet. Hillary’s party diminished U.S. nuclear superiority with the START Treaty, and promised to reduce nuclear assets 33% below even the new pro-Russian quotas.

(5)  Democrat Policies Strengthened Russia’s Allies, Increased Its Influence

(6)  Hillary’s Policies Emboldened Russian Advances In Eastern Europe

  • As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton took part in the decision to abandon the Eastern European missile defense shield promised by the previous Republican administration. U.S. allies objected, but The New York Times reported that Russian President Medvedev stated, “We appreciate the responsible approach.” Sure he did!
  • After signalling surrender to Russian interests with the missile shield and START debacles, Hillary’s Democrats stood by as an emboldened Russia annexed Crimea and instigated unrest in Ukraine. As Reuters now reports, President Trump immediately pushed back on Russia’s Obama-era aggression in Eastern Europe.

(7)  Hillary Directed The Transfer of American Weapons Technology To Russia

  • In 2010, Secretary Clinton assisted Russian President Medvedev in his “Go Russia!” campaign to create a Russian Silicon Valley-type technology enclave in Skolkovo, outside Moscow. The initiative contributed to Russian advances in weapons technology like hypersonic missiles. Hillary personally lobbied for the project with dozens of American technology firms which then contributed up to $23 million to the Clinton Foundation.
    • So far, no leak has surfaced confirming that Hillary’s office sported a “Go Russia!” promotional poster next to the one of Che Guevara.

(8)  Hillary’s “Reset”,  Anti-Terror Bungles And Other American Betrayals

  • The Democrats’ Pro-Russian tendencies were demonstrated to Putin well before Obama’s pledge of further missile-defense concessions to outgoing President Medvedev was caught on an open mic. But now even New York Times readers heard about it.
  • Russian intelligence officials warned on several occasions that Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a security threat, but even after his terror-training trip to Dagestan, Obama’s national security team took no action. Putin must have gotten a good laugh out of the administration’s claim that Tsarnaev escaped detection due to a misspelling in a single database.
  • Eager to press forward on the “Russian Reset”, Hillary and the Democrats hid from congressional committees their knowledge of Russian violations of the INF nuclear missile treaty, in order to secure passage of the pro-Russia START Treaty.

(9)  Democrats’ Historic Affinity To Russia Contrasts With Republican Opposition To Kremlin Goals

  • Hillary’s party worked clandestinely to undermine President Reagan’s ultimately successful policy to cripple the Soviet economy through an aggressive defense build-up, similar to that proposed by Trump. In 1983, Senator Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov offering to help undermine Reagan’s policy in exchange for Soviet help in Kennedy’s Presidential bid of 1984.
    • Hillary had conspired with Senator Kennedy’s staff in 1974, when, as a Watergate Committee staffer, she concealed documents in an attempt to deprive Richard Nixon of legal counsel in the impeachment investigation.
  • Hillary’s rival in the 2016 Democrat primary, Bernie Sanders, was so enamored with the Soviet Union that he went there on his honeymoon.

(10)  Hillary’s Party Released Russian Spies and American Traitors

  • In 2010, when the FBI arrested a Russian spy ring which had infiltrated Hillary’s circle of friends, her State Department arranged a prisoner swap in which all of the Russian spies were deported without prosecution. The prisoner exchange occurred a mere 2 weeks after the arrests, setting a record for this type of negotiation, which normally takes years. Unbelievably, no Americans were released in the “swap” because Russia released Russians too!
  • Days before leaving office in 2017, Democrat President Obama commuted the sentence of Bradley (Chelsea) Manning, who had committed one of the most damaging security breaches in American history. The release of detailed plans of American military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan undoubtedly cost American lives. If Putin needed proof of which party he could trust to betray American interests, this was it.

Putin wanted Trump to lose because he wanted America to lose.

Mueller Probe of Russian Spy Halted In 2010 On Obama Order; Hillary Implicated

by

Obama Whisked Russian Spy Out of Country After Arrest

FBI Director Robert Mueller’s 10-Year Investigation Squashed By Attorney General Eric Holder

In June of 2010, in another Mueller probe into Kremlin mischief, the FBI arrested a Russian spy who infiltrated Hillary Clinton’s inner circle by attaching herself to a close friend of the Secretary of State. Cynthia Murphy provided financial services to Clinton associate Alan Patricof, the Russian-American who served as finance chairman for Hillary Clinton’s run for the U.S. Senate. Patricof notified Hillary aide Huma Abedin when he learned of the investigation.

Within 2 weeks of the arrests of Murphy and 9 other spies, Obama closed the investigation and sent the operatives back to Russia without obtaining further information from them. The move limited damage to Hillary Clinton’s political aspirations.

The FBI Director at the time was Robert Mueller, recently appointed as Special Counsel in the manufactured Trump-Russia probe.

FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi explained the objectives of the Kremlin-directed operation: to collect information helpful to Moscow by blending spies into American governmental and academic institutions. According to The Washington Times,

the spy ring’s reports to Moscow revealed that the group was providing important data on the international gold markets, U.S. foreign policy toward Russia and Asia, and the identities of people applying for positions at the CIA.

Instead of prosecuting the suspects, or even interrogating them to gain intelligence, the Obama administration hastily arranged a prisoner swap to whisk the spies out of the country. Normally, prisoner swaps take years of intense negotiations, but this one took 2 weeks.

Amazingly, the prisoners released by the Russians were not Americans. They were themselves Russians, accused by Russia of being American spies. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had arranged a Russian-American prisoner swap where both sides released Russians.

The furious effort to release the Russians contrasted starkly with the administration’s refusal to help actual Americans unlawfully detained in Iran, Portugal, and Mexico. Unfortunately for those detainees, their release could not be linked to a political goal of the President or Secretary of State.

The Guardian reported that “the case was brought to a swift conclusion before it could complicate the president’s campaign to ‘reset’ US relations with Russia.”

Obama feared spies would leave on their own, then released them

Obama Attorney General Eric Holder stated that he ordered the spies’ arrests because he feared that they would leave the country. And then he escorted them out of the country!

Holder stated, “This was an extraordinary case, developed through years of work by investigators, intelligence lawyers, and prosecutors.” And when evidence pointed to Hillary Clinton, he released the spies in record time!

The Washington Post described the damage inflicted by the deal:

“One thing that makes it harder to recruit people for work like this is the prospect you’re going to be in a world of hurt if you get caught. If the worst you have to worry about is the American government’s catch-and-release policy, what kind of deterrent is that?” said Stephen Sestanovich, a Russia expert who has worked for both Republican and Democratic administrations.

John L. Martin, who supervised dozens of espionage cases during a 26-year career at the Justice Department, said earlier spy exchanges took years to work out. The speed at which the latest one occurred was “absolutely unprecedented,” he said.

Indeed, the swap could feed Republican criticism that the Obama administration is too accommodating toward Russia.

How are we supposed to believe that Russia wanted this bunch of weaklings to lose the election? It’s absurd.

Spy Release Part of Obama-Clinton Policy of Early-Often Surrender

The timing of the arrests and quick release of the Russian spies was curious. Just 3 days before the arrests, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev met with Obama and Secretary Clinton at the White House. It was Obama’s seventh meeting with Medvedev in 17 months, and not a single memo was ever leaked to The New York Times!

The Times reported that the parties discussed economic policy; that is, when they weren’t discussing ways to undermine FBI investigations uncovering Russian spies working for Hillary Clinton’s friends. Days before, The Times reports, Medvedev visited California to sell Silicon Valley executives on his own technology venture in Skolkovo.

The Skolkovo venture, promoted by Hillary Clinton, turned out to be a front for the Russian military. It resulted in Russia gaining classified American technology relating to advanced weapons systems. The Clinton Foundation received up to $23 million in donations from the firms that Hillary lured to Skolkovo.

The constant early contact between the Obama White House and the Kremlin had resulted in major gains for the Russians, and nothing but abject surrender for the Americans. Yet The Times and its Democrat allies saw nothing of a conspiratorial nature in the whole humiliating episode. It cheerily reported that after a 105-minute phone call with Obama, Medvedev quipped, “The ear starts getting stiff.” That’s one conversation we don’t want the NSA to release.

Of course, this unbroken early string of American concessions only set the table for more concessions later. While discussing missile defense in March 2012, Obama was caught on an open mic telling Medvedev, “I have more flexibility after the election.” He was telling the Russian President that American voters disliked American Presidents surrendering to Russia, so he was waiting until after the election to surrender.

Mueller And The Release of the Russian Spies

It’s a sure bet that the Democrat media have no interest in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s experience as the FBI Director who was ordered by Obama to end a 10-year investigation that uncovered actual Russian espionage. Until this week, they apparently had no idea that presidents could even offer opinions to the FBI.

Mueller can shed some light about which party conspired to excuse Russian espionage, and which candidate had a personal interest in making the matter go away. Of course, The Times and The Washington Post don’t seem to have much of a nose for news when the news isn’t good for the Democrats. But the internet is a terrible thing, and they wrote all about it in 2010. They just need to be reminded.

Comey Memo: Democrats Oppose Release; Release Chelsea Manning Instead

by

New York Times report on Comey memo confirms Trump’s break with Obama-era silent treatment of cabinet officials

On the day that historic traitor Chelsea Manning was released from prison, Democrats are opposing the release of a memo written by prodigious diarist James Comey to himself. Congressman Jason Chaffetz and Senator Richard Burr have requested the release of this Comey memo and others he penned during the fraudulent investigation, but so far Comey and the New York Times are balking. This is because any real scrutiny of the manufactured claims in the demented Russia Hack narrative would collapse the whole rotting edifice. As long as the Democrat media can contaminate the climate with evidence-free claims questioning Trump’s loyalty to America, they can keep this bad movie playing.

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the world last week, and the White House confirmed, that “there has been no effort to impede our investigation.” Yet The Times cites a memo by a man savaged by Democrats from Pelosi to Schumer to opine that Trump is clamping it down.

Fearing the truth, Democrats are ridiculing the Russians’ offer to release their own transcript of the meeting. Democrats only favor transparency when it suits their partisan agenda.

The reptilian head of the Senate Democrats, Chuck Schumer, says he was “shaken” by the report, but a witness stated he wasn’t shaken but “rattled.”  He is doubtless now coaxing crocodile tears for another big show for the cameras. All this for two men, Comey and Flynn, that Trump FIRED!

Comey is said to be “a copious note-taker“, so let’s see the rest of them. The Anne Frank of the FBI must have some interesting entries about the tarmac meeting between AG Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, but that wouldn’t be the sort of thing the newspaper of record would want in the public record. What did Jim write to himself when he agreed to allow Hillary Clinton to destroy computers in the e-mail investigation, or when he declined to interview her under oath?

Release all records relating to this nonsense and expose the Russia Hack meme for what it is: the psychotic rantings of petulant losers. Where’s the party for Chelsea?

Comey Memo Trump Flynn Times
Which one’s Chelsea?

Trump Leak To Lavrov Was Old News, Except To Washington Post Readers

by

Post Hides Behind Anonymous Source In Trump Leak Scoop

The breathless report in The Washington Post about the Trump leak to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov actually revealed information that was publicly known months before. The Daily Beast reported in March that the American raid in Yemen in February yielded information about terrorists using bombs in laptop batteries in plots to blow up airliners. The Washington Post had previously sided with Yemeni sources over U.S. military officials in claiming the raid was unsuccessful.

If Russia has access to the internet, Lavrov could have read public reports that proved the value of the intelligence that The Post alleges he only learned about at the recent White House meeting.

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster denied that any classified intelligence sources were divulged to Russia during the meeting. The meeting was attended only by Trump, McMaster and a small circle of Trump officials and the Russian officials. The Post, as usual, cites only “former U.S. intelligence” officials. That means Obama hacks, who continue to collude with the Democrat media to promote the absurd Russia Hack meme.

The Post is “withholding most plot details” because it wants to keep its readers in the dark about information that everyone else in the world knew about 6 weeks ago.

The Russia Hack meme is a fraud.

Leave a comment:

    Debunking The Russia Hack Meme

    by

    Russia Hack: If Putin wanted Hillary to lose, we have nothing to worry about. Because that would mean he’s an idiot.

    The Russia Hack meme is a steaming pile of horse manure. It doesn’t pass the smell test.

    Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration were Russia’s greatest allies since the basketball referees at the 1972 Olympics. During their tenure (known as “the Hay Day” in the Kremlin), America surrendered much of its nuclear superiority, technological advantages in advanced military weapons systems, and strategic influence in the Middle East and Europe. Our allies were confused and weakened, while Russia used its newfound influence to benefit its own allies. (What a concept!) 

    Consider just this episode: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama signed off on the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium assets to the official, state owned Russian atomic energy agency. The company which sold the uranium mines made a fortune, and its officers and affiliates donated $140 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton is a close associate of the Canadian financier who made the deal happen, and Bill was instrumental in making the foreign connections that got the ball rolling.

    Hillary’s reset was really a surrender to Russian demands at the expense of her own country’s strategic interests. Russia did the ground-and-pound on Uncle Sam in the START Treaty negotiations, in the uranium deal, and in Secretary Clinton’s initiative to transfer American technological advantages to Russia’s own fledgling Silicon Valley at Skolkovo, outside Moscow.

    Unless Vladimir Putin is a traitor to Mother Russia, or a moron, it is inconceivable that he would want Hillary’s party to get off the mat and hand things over to an exuberantly patriotic, military-supporting, capitalist champion of American business interests. Not to mention, one whose fossil fuel-based energy policy has the potential to devastate Putin’s economy by sending massive amounts of cheap American natural gas to Russia’s currently captive market.

    The Russia Hack meme is a fraud, conceived and cultivated by a defeated party and its media zombies in the wake of a well-earned spanking. Aghast at the prospect of losing its ability to turn America into a progressive hellhole, the Democrat Party broke its 99-year romance with Lenin’s party and blamed them for the breakup.

    Every accusation has been a laughable lie if you only remember how Hillary’s Democrats prostrated themselves before Russia for 8 years. You cannot think Putin would actually prefer Trump over Hillary, unless you think maybe he was intimidated by her Chairman Mao pant suits.

    And what’s the scandal, anyway? One or two Trump people were among the thousand or so politicians in DC who talked to Russians last year? So what? This is not an investigation to find a criminal. This is an investigation to find a crime!

    Leave a comment:

      Who Would Russia Prefer: Trump or Hillary?

      by

      Who Would Putin Prefer? Not A Tough Choice

      Russia Hack Mao
      “Comrades!”
      Russia Hack Hillary
      “Comrades!”
      Russia Hack Putin
      “What’s not to like?”

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Vladimir Putin and Russia have one objective regardless of who sits in the Oval Office: to promote the interests of Russia by destabilizing and weakening the American government. They’ve pursued this objective through 100 years of Republican and Democrat presidents.

      That being said, if Putin had to choose between the America First and the America Surrender candidate, it is irrational to believe he would choose Donald Trump, the America First candidate.

      • Donald Trump promised a strong America, militarily and economically. Hillary Clinton demonstrated the opposite.
      • Donald Trump promised to support our allies, like Israel and el-Sisi’s Egypt, and oppose our adversaries, like Russian allies Iran and Syria. Hillary demonstrated the opposite.
      • Donald Trump promised an energy policy emphasizing America’s cheap, abundant energy resources, to lower energy costs and stimulate industrial growth, all the while undercutting the one-dimensional Russian economy’s major source of revenue: fossil fuel exports. Hillary Clinton’s green energy fantasy failed under Obama and in every country that tried it, devastating economies and impoverishing populations across the globe. And she promised more of this. That’s GOOD for Russia.

      Given that Russia’s known objective is to weaken America, it really wasn’t that tough a choice, was it, Vlad?

      National Defense

      Energy

      Leave a comment:

        Russia Hack – Democrat Party Empowers Russia In Europe, Middle East

        by

        Hillary, Obama Abandon U.S. Allies, Strengthen Russia

        If you’re in full possession of your faculties and find it hard to believe that Vladimir Putin preferred the America First Candidate over the Surrender Candidate in the 2016 election, the following won’t make it any easier:

        • In September 2009, on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland, Secretary Clinton’s party announced the abandonment of the planned anti-ballistic missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. U.S. allies vehemently objected, while Putin pronounced the move as “right and brave.”
          • In March 2013, the Democrats abandoned an alternate plan to defend our Eastern European allies, declining to place land-based interceptors in the region.
        • In April 2010, Secretary Clinton negotiated a virtual American surrender in the START Treaty agreement. The treaty allowed Russia to build new, modern weapons, while forcing the U.S. to destroy existing stock. It scrapped the monitoring and inspection programs in the original agreement. It allowed Russia to unilaterally set the number of warheads both countries can maintain, and set a level playing field even though U.S. allies across the globe depend on American protection, while Russia merely needs to protect itself. It allowed Russia to maintain its ten-to-one numerical advantage in tactical nuclear weapons.
          • In 2014, Obama announced his intention to unilaterally reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal 33% below the levels agreed upon in the START Treaty.
        • Hillary’s Democrats repeatedly bowed to Russia in Syria, allowing Russia to prop up its ally Assad, shunning even the warning of The Washington Post to refrain from abandoning the Syrian crisis to Putin.
        • Hillary’s Democrats bungled Iraq so badly that Russian ally and American enemy Iran was allowed to send troops to gain a foothold in Iraq, in areas that the U.S. had already stabilized in the successful Iraq War before Obama abandoned our Iraqi partners.
        • In 2005, Senator Obama persuaded Ukraine that Russia presented no threat, and secured funding for Ukraine to destroy or export tons of ammunition, artillery and missiles which were sorely needed when Russia subsequently annexed Crimea in the Ukrainian peninsula, and then mounted armed incursions into eastern Ukraine. As President, Democrat Obama then refused Ukraine’s plea for weapons support, instead offering to send MREs, military food provisions, the same support he offered the Free Syrian Army we had pledged to help. And he even failed to deliver on those meager offers.
        • As a direct result of Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2015, Russia announced an $800 million deal to supply its ally Iran with the S300 missile, whose sole purpose is to shoot any American or American ally missile out of the sky. In 2010, before Hillary’s Democrats obliterated the sanctions program, Russia had cancelled the missile deal under international pressure. After receiving $1.7 billion from Obama, Iran – the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism – increased its military budget by 145%.

        Does anybody really believe that Putin would influence the American election to remove these Democrats from power?

        Leave a comment:

          Russia Hack: In Skolkovo, Hillary Trades US Technology To Russia For Millions In Foundation Donations

          by

          If Putin had blocked Hillary’s path to the White House after the Skolkovo caper, his comrades would have tossed him into the Volgograd

          In September 2009, Russia announced plans to create its own Silicon Valley at a research facility named Skolkovo. The initiative, titled “Go Russia!”,  was promoted as a means of advancing Russian commercial technology by partnering with private international technology companies. In reality, as a 2014 FBI investigation found, the project was a successful effort to import classified U.S. technology to advance Russian military aims. The Russian military co-opted the program to gain sensitive technology programs to nullify U.S. superiority in weapons systems like hypersonic missiles and advanced radar. And the name of the American who willingly facilitated the transfer was not Donald Trump, but Hillary Clinton.

          Secretary Clinton recruited more than 20 U.S. companies, including Cisco, Microsoft, Boeing, GE and Google, to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the Russian operation. The companies then donated up to $23 million to the Clinton Foundation.

          One of the companies that assisted Russia was Joule Energy. One of four Joule board members was John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager for her 2016 presidential bid. Podesta’s company received $35 million from a Russian organization with deep ties to Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin. When Podesta joined the Obama administration as senior advisor in 2013, he failed to disclose his ties to Joule.

          One must ask: Knowing this, why would Vladimir Putin want Hillary Clinton to lose the 2016 election? He can’t even swim!

          Leave a comment:

            Hillary & Obama Gave Russia 20% of U.S. Uranium Assets

            by

            $140M In Clinton Foundation Donations Sealed The Deal

            Ask your local Russia Hack conspiracy theorist why Putin would want the Democrats to lose in 2016, considering the uranium bonanza they gave him. The Clintons and the Obama administration took a series of actions which gave Russia control of 20% of America’s uranium, a strategic asset used to produce nuclear energy and weapons. In exchange for $140 million in donations from Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation, Secretary Clinton approved the sale of the mining company to the official, state-owned Russian atomic agency, Rosatom.  A brief summary:

            • In September 2005, Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra sought access to uranium mines in Kazakhstan. Democrat ex-President Bill Clinton flew in Giustra’s private jet to a meeting Clinton arranged with corrupt Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev. Bill publicly praised the autocrat, and 3 days later Giustra’s company was granted what he wanted: a stake in 3 uranium mines in Kazakhstan.
            • Then, Giustra donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
            • And then, Giustra pledged an additional $100 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill said, “I love this guy!”
            • In 2007, Giustra’s company, Uranium One, bought uranium mines in 4 U.S. states while its chairman, Ian Telfer, donated $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation.  Giustra sold his personal holdings for $45 million.
            • In 2009, Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State, and the Russian atomic agency, Rosatom, bought 17% interest in Uranium One. Chairman Telfer donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.
            • In June 2010, Rosatom announced a deal to acquire a 51% interest in Uranium One, pending the approval of Secretary of State Clinton. Uranium One and its affiliates had donated $8.6 million to the Clinton Foundation in the past 2 years.
            • On June 29, 2010, in Moscow, Bill Clinton made $500,000 for a speech to a Kremlin-affiliated Russian investment bank promoting Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One.
            • Then, in October 2010, Secretary Clinton and the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment approved Rosatom’s acquisition of a majority interest in Uranium One.
            • By January 2013, through Clinton’s term as Secretary of State, Russian atomic agency Rosatom owned 100% interest in Uranium One, along with its 20% share of American uranium assets. Its chairman, Ian Telfer, had donated $2.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.

            …And Putin wanted Hillary to…lose? What more could Putin ask for? In a headline worthy of The New York Times‘ Walter Duranty, Russian propaganda outlet Pravda proclaimed, “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers The World“. Rosatom head Sergei Kiriyenko rejoiced to Putin, “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20% of U.S. reserves!”

            Read New York Times Story on Putin’s Haul

            Excerpt:

            Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

            If Putin tried to get Hillary and the Democrats to lose the election after this spectacularly successful partnership, he’s either a traitor to Mother Russia or an idiot.

             

             

            Leave a comment: