DNC Hack Is Fake News

Russia Hack theory ignores evidence of internal leak

Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile claims that Debbie Wasserman Schultz hid her knowledge of the alleged DNC hack for over a month before alerting other party officials. If this doesn’t put the lie to the theory that Russia gave the e-mails to Wikileaks, then nothing will.

In April 2016, the FBI alerted Wasserman Schultz that the DNC servers had been breached. Curiously, the DNC Chair declined the FBI’s “offer” to investigate the matter. (Since when does the FBI “offer” to help investigate a matter of national security?)

Wasserman Schultz knew that the leaker resided in her own organization. Chances are, Comey’s FBI did, too.

Jailed Wasserman Shultz IT Aide Awan Had Access To DNC Server

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ((D-FL) and 80 other House Democrats employed corrupt Pakastani native Imran Awan as their IT specialist. This is because hiring an honest American adds nothing to the progressives’ rich multicultural tapestry.

At the time of the DNC hack, Awan had access to the DNC server, courtesy of Wasserman Schultz. Circa News reported in September that Awan uploaded massive amounts of data – terabits – from the DNC server to his private Dropbox account. He is under investigation for allegations of selling information to foreign governments.

On February 2, 2017, the FBI and the Capitol Police launched an investigation of Awan relating to cyber crimes. Most Democrats then released Awan from IT duties, but Schultz kept him on until July 26 – the day after the FBI arrested him for bank fraud and 3 other charges. The Capitol Police have taken possession of several of Awan’s computers. In May 2017, Schultz threatened a Capitol Police Chief with “consequences” unless he returned the equipment.

Schultz’s loyalty to Awan seems baffling, considering his mind-numbing record. In addition to illicitly uploading terabits of DNC files, he illegally accessed congressional servers 5,400 times; he manipulated the terms of a $50,000 life insurance policy meant for his stepmother, who states he illegally confines and threatens her; he defaulted on a $100,000 “loan” from an Iranian fugitive tied to terror organization Hezbollah; he has two wives, one of whom told police he keeps her in a house in Virginia as a slave; he has made millions working for Democrat staffers, and wired $293,000 to Pakistan the week of his arrest. Oh, and he’s in the country as a winner in Chuck Schumer’s glorious Diversity Lottery immigration scam!

Wasserman Schultz even trotted out the “Islamophobia” accusation against this miscreant’s detractors. She really really really really really doesn’t want you to know about her IT cyber-fraudster. She wants you to know about “Russia.”

Investigation proves July 2016 DNC hack was an inside job

A group of 30 former top security experts from the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies, formed a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). They examined the evidence in this case and concluded that the July 2016 DNC hack originated on-site, perpetrated by someone with physical access to DNC servers. Democrat officials continue to blame this and previous breaches on Russia, without citing any factual evidence. The Nation quoted the VIPS report in its analysis:

• There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

• Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

VIPS based its conclusions on physical science. The metadata of the leaked material, examined by an intelligence source working with VIPS, demonstrates that the data transfer could not possibly have taken place over the internet. In the transfer, 1,976 megabytes were downloaded from the DNC server in 87 seconds. This transfer rate, 22.7 megabytes per second, lies beyond the capability of current internet technologies. A simple thumb drive, however, achieves precisely this rate.

The theory that Russian intelligence executed this hack collapses under the weight of scientific evidence.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange hints about leaker’s identity

Five days after the July 5 data breach, DNC Director of Voter Expansion Seth Rich was murdered after midnight on the street in his Washington, DC neighborhood. Shot several times, the perpetrator stole none of the items of value found on his person, including a wallet, watch and jewelry.

Wikileaks released its batch of DNC e-mails on July 22, 2016. On August 9, Julian Assange posted a $20,000 reward for information leading to the murderer of Seth Rich. Assange cryptically stated. “I’m suggesting our sources take risks.” Investigators do not know if Seth Rich was connected with the leaks in any way.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz rejected the FBI’s assistance in finding the DNC hacker because she knew the leaks were internal. The threat to national security didn’t move the FBI to demand access to the computers in question. The Russia Hack theory is a baseless fabrication of the Democrat Party, the media, and their allies in Obama’s government.

 

 

Share this with your liberal