Skip links

Main navigation

Russia Hack

russia hack

DANCHENKO INTERVIEW SUMMARY

by

In Microsoft Word.

PSS-Interview-SummaryDownload

NOTES:

  • The only redactions I filled in are Danchenko, FBI personnel names, and info filled in over the redactions in the released document.
  • CAPITALIZED references like SOURCE 1, RUSSIAN CONTACT, indicate text provided in the document over the redactions.
  • All unknown redactions are entered as ****, regardless of length.
  • There are 2 “Russian officials.” I denote one as “Russian Official”, and the other as “Russian official”
  • The USPER on pages 20, 35 & 36 doesn’t appear to be the same USPER as the one on pages 50 & 54. This is apart from USPER 2.

 

 

Russiagate: The Cambridge Connection

by

A conga line of Cambridge crackpots pushed the Russiagate hoax.

How many people associated with your old school are central figures in an effort to subvert an American presidential election? Zero, probably, unless your old school is the University of Cambridge in the UK.

At least six members of the Cambridge community are intricately woven into the Trump-Russia collusion yarn; four of them did a fair share of the spinning themselves.

The Cambridge Six

CHRISTOPHER STEELE

This crumpet-eating schmuck took $168,000 (American) from Hillary Clinton and untold thousands more from Obama’s FBI to smear Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump in 2016. In conversations with DOJ collaborator Bruce Ohr, he professed to having a deranged anxiety about Trump becoming president of the United States. Instead of seeking emotional therapy and minding his own business, he endeavored to avenge King George’s honour for the loss of the colonies by trying to blow up the country.

Steele graduated from Cambridge in 1986 and spent the next 22 years at MI6 preparing for his next career as director of Orbis Business Intelligence, a smear operation in the vein of his pal Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS.

RICHARD DEARLOVE

Dearlove supervised Steele for several years as the head of British spy agency MI6. In the early fall of 2016, he facilitated the transmittal of the execrable Steele Dossier to the FBI through a top UK government official. In his country, they call back-stabbing allies like him “Sir.” We call him a putz.

Dearlove’s connections with Cambridge are many. A 1966 graduate, he has since held many titles at the University, including Master of Pembroke College and President of the College Boat Club, whatever that means.

Along with CIA spy Stefan Halper, he co-convened the weekly meetings of the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar, attended by like-minded, haughty conspiracy theorists. They smoke pipes, drink tea and read Ian Fleming novels, from what can be gathered. He and Halper quit at the height of the Red Scare, citing – you guessed it – Russian interference in the Seminar.

Cambridge connection

STEFAN HALPER

Dual US/UK citizen Halper is a Senior Fellow at Cambridge and head of its political studies department. A longtime CIA asset, in apparent service to Obama’s government in 2016 he tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign by making overtures to Trump associates Sam Clovis, George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. He set up Page at a Cambridge seminar and unsolicitedly badgered Papadopoulos in an attempt to get him talking about non-existent Russian spies. He is rumored to be the source of an accusation that American hero General Michael Flynn conspired with an ethnic Russian Cambridge research assistant at a conference that Flynn attended at his invitation. Nicknamed “the Walrus” for his tremendous girth, he’d be a contender at the annual 4th of July Coney Island Hot Dog Eating Contest if we ever let him take part in a patriotic American tradition again.

Curiously, Halper’s invitation-only July 2016 Cambridge event was attended by Rinat Akhmetshin, a “former” Russian intelligence officer with acknowledged ties to the Clinton campaign. Akhmetshin had attended the Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump, Jr. a month earlier as part of the Russia/Hillary/Fusion GPS contingent. What a coincidence!

ANDREW WOOD

Another stiff we’re supposed to call “Sir,” Wood – descended from a long line of dense vegetation – admits that, at Christopher Steele’s direction, in November of 2016 he advised U.S. Senator John McCain of the details of the Clinton campaign’s Steele Dossier. He arranged for McCain associate David Kramer to receive a copy of the dossier, which Kramer then distributed to 12 entities, including Obama’s State Department and numerous media outlets. He had been in contact with Steele regarding the smear document since August of 2016.

A Cambridge graduate, Wood was a longtime diplomat with extensive experience in Russia.

RICHARD CLAYTON

An underreported episode in the Democrat Party’s Trump-Russia fiasco, the Alfa Bank affair involved a team of conspiracy-minded anti-Trump zealots who in the summer of 2016 claimed to have uncovered a suspicious link between a Trump Tower computer server and a Russian bank. These self-described altruistic cyber warriors managed to get the FBI to investigate the idiotic theory, which it did, reporting to the New York Times on October 31 that the link involved spam emails from a marketing firm having nothing to do with the Trump campaign.

Although all of the acknowledged cyber experts worked at American universities and business firms, they mysteriously chose to forward a “white paper” to cybersecurity researcher Richard Clayton at … the University of Cambridge. Clayton told Slate magazine that the anti-Trump cyber theorists were likely onto something. Even though they weren’t.

SVETLANA LOKHOVA

A dual Russia/UK citizen, Lokhova was a Cambridge post-graduate student in Stefan Halper’s department in 2014 when American hero General Michael Flynn, then Obama’s Defense Intelligence Agency Director, attended one of the Halper-Dearlove Cambridge Intelligence Seminars. She had little interaction with Flynn, and met him briefly in the public setting. She describes Halper as “a lurking presence with a horrible aura” who “hated all Russians.” She states that Halper circulated rumors that she was a Russian spy, though in January 2016 Halper invited her to his wife’s birthday party. There is no indication whatsoever that she is a Russian spy.

For whatever storied history Cambridge may lay claim to, its current crop is abundantly and embarrassingly stocked with conspiratorial crackpots who caught red fever in 2016 and deigned themselves qualified to do something about it. The first word in the ancient Cambridge English Dictionary oughte be Anti-American.


Anatomy of the Brett Kavanaugh Smear

by

The smear operation against Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh offers a textbook example of how Democrat opposition research works. Study it.

To begin with, understand that Democrats reach conclusions against Republican nominees before any research is done. The particular allegation is woven around kernals of truth unearthed in the process. It is fabricated with an eye toward deceiving Democrat voters with a seemingly plausible allegation supported by insinuation, not facts.

Prelude

Trump nominated Kavanaugh on July 9. Three days earlier, on July 6, accuser Christine Blasey Ford told Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and the Washington Post that Brett Kavanaugh had attempted to rape her at a party in the mid-1980s. She stated that another boy, Mark Judge, assisted Kavanaugh in the commission of the crime.

On July 10, Ford advisor Ricki Seidman told participants in a conference call to the American Constitution Society, “I do think that over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee.”

As a staffer for Senator Ted Kennedy in 1991, Seidman pressured Anita Hill to publicly smear Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas with allegations of sexual harassment. Several years earlier, she had produced attack ads smearing nominee Robert Bork on behalf of a far-left political action group.

So you can see where all this was going.

A Step-By-Step Guide on How To Smear a Republican Target

  1. Research every facet of the target’s past and present life
  2. Arrange the facts into a sensational, fabricated narrative that emotional, gullible Democrat voters want to believe
  3. Make the supporting events unverifiable

Anatomy of the Kavanaugh Smear

1. Research

The second that Brett Kavanaugh appeared on Trump’s list of potential nominees, opposition researchers hired by the Democrat Party and their supporters gathered all available information about Kavanaugh: work history, school history, social history, family history. They read everything he ever wrote, poured over transcripts of his public remarks, and compiled lists of everyone he ever associated with, including former classmates, co-workers, friends and family. They analyzed everything these people ever did, said or wrote.

If lucky, the researchers uncover a true, hot-off-the-presses incident requiring nothing but a timely release of the damning details. Examples of this would include:

  • Finding that the candidate founded the KKK chapter in his state, like Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, who Democrat voters sent to the US Senate for 40 years..
  • Finding that the candidate, a drunken philanderer, drove a female staffer off a bridge into a lake and then abandoned her to drown while going back to the hotel to sleep, never telling anyone. That would be Ted Kennedy, who Democrat voters sent to the US Senate for 40 years.
  • Finding that the candidate carried on hundreds of extramarital affairs and sexually abused many women, including one staffer that he summoned to his hotel room, exposing his excited member and telling her to “kiss it.” That would be Bill Clinton.

Absent such luck, as in the case of Brett Kavanaugh and his exemplary record (300 opinions in 12 years as a district court judge, first in his class in high school, college and law school), proceed to step 2.

2. Fabricate

The Democrats struck gold when they discovered that one of the hundreds of Kavanuagh’s former classmates wrote a book bragging about being a blackout drunk who did things in high school that he doesn’t remember.

The smear merchants simply needed to assemble the following kernals of truth into a sensational narrative that gullible, emotional Democrat voters would want to believe:

  • Former Kavanaugh classmate Mark Judge was a blackout drunk.
  • Kavanaugh drinks beer.
  • Kavanaugh’s classmates attended parties together.
  • The accuser knew Kavanaugh in high school.
  • Mark Judge wrote about working at a Safeway in high school.
  • The accuser renovated her house in 2008.

If you can’t weave these disparate facts into a rape accusation, you’re not a Democrat Party opposition researcher. If you believe the rape accusation despite Kavanaugh’s exemplary record, hundreds of supporting testimonials from his decades-long associations, and a complete absence of witnesses and evidence, you are a gullible, emotional Democrat voter.

Once the fabricators settled on a potential smear, they researched every girl that could possibly have been within reach of Kavanaugh during any of his 4 years at Georgetown Prep. Their mission: Find one of them who could miraculously place Kavanaugh and the drunken Mark Judge in a rape room with her.

3. Allege events that cannot be verified

  • The accuser doesn’t pinpoint a place, time or even year.
  • The accuser doesn’t say who drove her home.
  • The accuser ascribes actions she took in the ensuing years to an unverifiable state of mind, i.e. fear of flying, a second door.
  • The accuser claims that, on a trip with her mother to Safeway, she saw Mark Judge. But she conveniently bails her mother out by saying that her mother didn’t see him because she insisted on separating herself from her mother in the Safeway because of ‘being a teenage girl.’

Sherlock Holmes couldn’t verify these events.

This is what you’re supposed to believe:

Brett Kavanaugh went to the same high school as Mark Judge. When Kavanaugh, who drinks beer, attempted to rape a girl in a drunken frenzy, Mark Judge was the only witness. Judge denies the allegation, but at this exact time he was in the throes of a blackout event and his testimony is therefore unreliable.

The accuser’s daily life is scarred by Kavanaugh’s vicious attack. Fearful of another such incident, she installed a second exit door on the front of her house. She feels trapped when flying but does so  constantly on pleasure trips.

The accuser doesn’t remember who invited her to the party, how she got there, or how she got home. But she vividly remembers seeing Mark Judge working at a Safeway exactly 4 to 6 weeks after the incident. How convenient, given that Judge wrote about working there in his 1997 memoir.

While most married women vote Republican and lean conservative, the woman Kavanaugh chose to attack is a hardcore leftist who supported Hillary, attends anti-Trump “resistance” marches and donates strictly to liberal political causes.

The accuser didn’t tell anyone about the event, including her mother and a good friend allegedly present at the party. The friend denies any knowledge of such a party, as do all other alleged attendees.

The accuser remembers almost nothing about the event, including the day, date and year. She doesn’t know the location of the house or whose house it was. The house doesn’t belong to any of the alleged attendees, so apparently these four or five children were swimming, drinking and partying at a house in which none of them lived.

The accuser remodeled her house in 2008. What to make of that? Well, she claimed that its purpose was to install a second front door on the house because of her fear of being trapped by another Brett Kavanaugh. That’ll grab your liberal! But now we know that the renovation added a completely separate space since rented by professionals and college students.

The Senate asked the accuser to testify on Capitol Hill. She claimed a fear of flying. The media backed that up with two friends who claimed to have known that she feared being in places with only one means of exit (like the front of her current house) due to what Kavanaugh did to her, even though she never told them what Kavanaugh did to her. It turns out she flies all the time and oddly lives in a residence with only one front door.

But Brett Kavanaugh does drink beer. Just like you, probably.

The Four Horsemen of the Preposterous: Brennan, Comey, Simpson, Steele

by

The Four Horsemen of the Trump-Russia saga are biblical only in their cunning and stupidity. Each visited his own plague upon us in service to their annointed siren, a haggard old battle axe rejected by the masses. Ye shall know them by their names: Brennan, Comey, Simpson, Steele.

(Left to right: Brennan, Comey, Simpson, Steele)

WAR
Christopher Steele

Behold! A Briton strides ashore, his pen a tool of war

Christopher Steele wrote the seminal document of the Trump-Russia hoax. In his dossier, he collected obvious disinformation through a conga line of professional Kremlin propagandists, and reported it as true. YOU could be forgiven for falling for this, but Steele LED THE RUSSIA DESK AT MI6!

What did we ever do to the Queen to deserve this? And where did Steele get the idea that he should be the arbiter of our elections? Chris, next time you feel a little anxious about an American election, see a therapist and leave us the hell alone.

PESTILENCE
Glenn Simpson

Beware! The rider’s louse shall spoil your house

Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS has been pestering the planet for decades now. Before hiring Steele to smear Trump, Simpson planted “news” in many of the outlets that you might otherwise be inclined to trust. If you’ve ever read hit pieces smearing anti-corruption crusaders in Venezuela, Russia, or at Planned Parenthood, you may be familiar with his “premium research.”

FAMINE
James Comey

Lo! Doth hunger follow where he go

The former FBI Director proved to be starved of intellect, and now the whole country is wasting away. When his insane counterpart at the CIA originally presented to him the Trump-Russia collusion hypothesis, he hesitated to jump on board. We now know this did not reflect a healthy sense of caution; he literally didn’t know what the hell John Brennan was mumbling about.

Maybe it was coming home every day to five stark raving, vagina-hat-wearing Hillary Clinton zealots, or maybe it was something else. But eventually Comey bought into the whole asinine theory and handed the psychos the levers to the most powerful investigative machinery on the planet. Now he just writes poetry.

DEATH
John Brennan, aka “The Tick”

…and lastly fear this horse’s rear

A corpulent red engorged tick, this communist-voting, sharia-affirming, rainbow-wearing alien drank all the leftist Kool-Aid he could hold until his gal Hillary lost. Then he burst, splattering his poisonous bile across the entire American landscape.

In contrast to most subversives at the point of this spear, Brennan actually believed the preposterous tale and agitated far and wide for it. He held secret meetings with British intelligence chiefs; sent “eyes-only” intelligence packets by courier to Obama; and briefed carefully selected activist congressional Democrats who then leaked to the media.

Since Brennan’s own agency lacked the statutory authority to conduct domestic spying operations on American citizens, he essentially commandeered FBI resources by goading the shell-shocked Comey into doing it. And he lied the whole time about what he knew and what he did.

A lifelong totalitarian sympathizer, nowadays he sits around spouting bromides about democracy like he’s James Madison.

Lo! The horsemen did they come
Be they evil, be they dumb

Trump Supporters Met in Seychelles – So What?

by

Chris Plante is right. The media doesn’t follow the news. Today’s bombshell involves a meeting between Trump supporters Erik Prince and George Nader that has been public knowledge for 3 months. The only thing secret about the meeting is that CNN just heard about it.

On December 6, 2017, Bloomberg reported that Blackwater founder Erik Prince held a January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles with potential business customers from the United Arab Emirates. During the meeting, one of the UAE participants suggested Prince pursue a business lead with a Russian hedge fund manager who was also in town. Prince took up the lead and met with Kirill Dmitriev for about 30 minutes, or “one beer.” I reported on that meeting over a month ago here.

The deranged Adam Schiff grilled Prince in a House Intelligence panel on December 1, 2017. Schiff imagined that Prince was acting to establish a back-channel between Trump and the Russians. The 100-page transcript of the testimony was released on December 6, but maybe CNN was busy covering another blockbuster that day, like how many Diet Cokes Trump drinks.

The entire point of the Democrats’ asinine Trump-Russia collusion charge is that Trump held secret talks with Russians throughout 2016 to somehow win the election. So how is it that in January 2017 Trump needed a person not associated with his campaign to establish a back-channel? Wasn’t he already doing that? The Steele Dossier claims that Trump already had Putin in his back pocket.

Democrats display dazzling economic igorance

Schiff told Bloomberg at the time that Prince “could not adequately explain why he traveled halfway around the world to meet with U.A.E. officials and, ultimately, the head of the Russian fund.”

Erik Prince is in the international security business. Only a blockhead like Schiff could be dumbfounded that such a person would travel to the area of the world where he conducts all his business, to meet with people experiencing the problems that Prince’s business addresses. Should Prince be meeting in, say, Ohio, with representatives of wedding cake bakers?

The equally demented California Democrat Eric Swalwell is aghast that Mr. Prince did not mention his meeting with obscure American businessman George Nader, who also had business there. CNN’s solid reporting tells us that Nader is a “Middle East specialist with ties to the Trump team.” No details, just “ties to the Trump team.” CNN ominously labels Nader a “man of mystery.”

Well blow me down! Two men with businesses in the Middle East met with people from the Middle East and a Russian also doing business in the Middle East! CNN doesn’t know of any other instances where international businessmen meet with foreigners about international business.

What’s worse, CNN reports that this “powerful businessman with ties to the Middle East is now cooperating with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.” Now, cooperating with Mueller’s witch hunt indicates nefariousness.

CNN is so far down the rabbit hole that anything in the world can be seen as evidence confirming their delusion. This is because they take at face value the moronic assertions of nitwits like Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell.

A Clue for the Conspiracy News Network

Eric Prince has nothing to do with the Trump team. He is a supporter and donor like countless other people. He was so worried about his House testimony that he did not even hire counsel going into it. When CNN finds out about this, it will no doubt indicate to them just how sinister his actions really were.

Did you know that Obama’s transition team sent “insiders” to Russia in 2008 and held secret back-channel negotiations with Iran? If you do, don’t tell CNN. They’re already stressed sending bloodhounds “halfway around the world” interviewing hookers about more insane allegations against the evil Trump.

CNN, the Democrats and their blind followers need an intervention. Trump should provide one by pulling the plug on Mueller’s folly and releasing every bit of their contrived “evidence.” Then we can move on to real scandals like Melania’s shoes and Trump’s ice cream eating habits.

Putin Unveils Invincible Missile, Neglects To Credit Hillary, Obama

by

Putin slights Hillary; no mention of key Obama-Clinton effort to assist Russian hypersonic missile program

In his annual address to Russian lawmakers this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russia now has a hypersonic nuclear missile which renders American defenses “useless.” In the strongest hint yet of the veracity of FBI Director James Comey’s scientific assessment that Putin “hates” Hillary Clinton, Putin did not mention the failed candidate even once. A shocking snub, considering her role in fostering the project.

In 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recruited dozens of experts from American technology giants like Cisco, GE and Google to help Russia build its own Silicon Valley in Skolkovo, outside Moscow. The companies enthusiastically lent their expertise to Russia in exchange for entry into Russian markets. Coincidentally, Hillary Clinton’s foundation then received tens of millions of dollars in donations from these very same companies.

In 2012, the US Army found that the Skolkovo initiative had launched its first major military effort: to develop hypersonic missiles.

In 2014, James Comey’s own FBI warned US technology firms that the Russian military had co-opted the program and had begun to apply the transferred technologies to defeat American missile defense systems. At this point, Comey offered no opinion on Putin’s psychological assessment of Hillary Clinton. Presumably, Putin was ok with Hillary’s program at the time.

Putin gives the backhand to Obama’s nuclear-free delusion

During Putin’s address, he unveiled a video depicting a mighty Russian warhead hurtling unstoppably toward Florida. His new ICBM travels at speeds many times that of American defense missiles. “Missile defense systems will be useless against it,” he bellowed. “Nobody listened to us. Well listen to us now!”

He clearly wasn’t listening to Obama at the Nuclear Summit in 2009. There, Obama told the world that the US will lead the way in reducing nuclear arms, and then the community of nations will follow. Soon, we will achieve Obama’s youthful dream of a nuclear-free world.

This is the second-most destructive dream American voters foisted upon us by electing Obama; the first being the dream he got from his insane, Marxist, polygamous father.

Here’s Obama’s rationale for unilaterally disarming in a dangerous world, in 2009:

It’s naïve for us to think that we can grow our nuclear stockpiles, the Russians continue to grow their nuclear stockpiles, and our allies grow their nuclear stockpiles, and that in that environment we’re going to be able to pressure countries like Iran and North Korea not to pursue nuclear weapons themselves.

Obama’s plan involved reducing the number of US nuclear warheads from 5,100 to 1,500, while allowing Russia to set other limits it thought acceptable for both countries. While Russia, China, North Korea and others upgraded their systems, Obama froze our systems, presumably in the name of fairness for countries not called America.

After pursuing this policy, not a single nation followed Obama’s lead, especially Russia, China, North Korea and Iran. Putin’s announcement is only the latest in a series of international actions exposing Obama’s dangerous nuclear delusion.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has stated publicly that he misses the Obama administration. So why is it so hard for President Putin to acknowledge his debt to Hillary?

Carter Page Assisted The FBI In Russian Spy Case

by

Carter Page had nothing to do with Russian spying and the FBI knew it when they sought a warrant to spy on him. Page assisted the FBI in a 2013 operation resulting in the prosecution of an actual Russian agent. The Democrat media conveniently forgets that it outed Page as a supposed Russian agent in the summer of 2016, and we’re supposed to believe that the Russians continued to talk to him throughout the year.

Consider just this: Between August and September of 2016, the Washington Post, Yahoo News and Democrat politicians announced publicly and repeatedly that Carter Page was a Russian agent. And then, in October, the FBI obtained a warrant to monitor Page’s communications with his Russian masters, hoping against hope that the Kremlin had still not heard that Carter Page had been “outed.” Because if they knew about this, the secret channel would have to shut down.

How much communication do you think went on between Page and the Kremlin after these reports became public? And by the way, Carter Page left the Trump team in September of 2016, so the FBI secured their warrant when he had nothing to do with Trump.

On August 5, 2016, a Washington Post headline screamed, “Trump adviser’s public comments, ties to Moscow stir unease.” The article stated, “In Moscow, all this is being watched closely.” And we are to believe that the Kremlin continued to use Page.

On September 23, 2016, Yahoo News’ Michael Isikoff, citing a congressional source, gave the world a heads-up about American intelligence monitoring of Page:

The source added that U.S. officials in the briefings indicated that intelligence reports about the adviser’s [Page’s] talks with senior Russian officials close to President Vladimir Putin were being “actively monitored and investigated.”

A senior U.S. law enforcement official did not dispute that characterization when asked for comment by Yahoo News. “It’s on our radar screen,” said the official about Page’s contacts with Russian officials. “It’s being looked at.”

You’re not an FBI super-sleuth, but given that hundreds of millions of people were notified that Page’s communications with Russian agents were being monitored by the FBI, how much communication do you think went on between Page and Russia?

There is no way in hell that the FBI believed that a warrant to spy on Carter Page would yield even a smidgen of such communication. They sought the warrant for the sole purpose of inserting a Trump campaign associate into their demented, concocted conspiracy. Page at this point was a former low-level Trump adviser whose influence on the campaign was imperceptible. This is what the Washington Post reported about their modern day Alger Hiss:

  • “Page submitted policy memos to the campaign and several times asked to be given a meeting with Trump, though his request was never granted.”
  • “Page participated in three dinners held for the campaign’s volunteer foreign policy advisers in the spring and summer of 2016…Trump did not attend.”

Horrors!

Meanwhile, the Steele Dossier spread provable lies about Page’s contacts with Russian officials. It stated that Page met with Putin associate Igor Sechin in July of 2016 to negotiate sanctions and energy policy on behalf of Trump. Page never met with Sechin and has volunteered to an interview with U.S. intelligence to state as much.

All four of the FISA Court requests signed by FBI officials against Page occurred after Page left his insignificant role as Trump adviser.

The FBI and the Democrat party want you to believe that this superstar was at the center of the greatest espionage caper in American history. Don’t.

How To Steele An Election: James Comey & The Steele Dossier

by

DNC funded Steele Dossier, Comey legitimized it

Steele Dossier Background

In April of 2016 the Democrat National Committeee (DNC) learned of a breach into its computer server. The server contained many e-mails demonstrating the DNC leadership’s contempt for blacks, Jews, Catholics, “needy Latinos“, and Bernie Sanders supporters, among others. Other e-mails laid out their collusion with the media and their railroading of Bernie Sanders.

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz initiated actions to limit the damage by directing the compliant media to a fictionalized conspiracy about Russian government hackers. Working behind layers of lawyers and PR firms, she hired cyber security firm Crowdstrike to “investigate” the alleged Russia hack. Crowdstrike found no physical evidence of Russian government involvement, but announced its conclusion implicating Russia based upon the hacker’s Russian-like methods and tools.

The DNC paid over $12 million to various legal and PR firms to create the Steele Dossier and other quack conspiracies which pushed the asinine Trump-Russia collusion fantasy.

In June, the DNC team hired former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele to put his name to the sensational head-fake known as the Steele Dossier. The dossier fraudulently accused Trump of Hollywood-style perversions, and of colluding with Putin to defeat Hillary Clinton.

The Steele Dossier allegations, contained in 9 reports totaling 35 pages, and compiled between June and December of 2016, struggled to find an audience. Team DNC repeatedly shopped the report to the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Yahoo News and The New Yorker. The outlets reported some of the allegations which they attributed to anonymous sources. But they stubbornly refused to stake their reputations on the entire collection of unbelievable and unverifiable fairy tales. What to do?

Enter James Comey, stage left

If the report itself failed to move the media to publish it, maybe an FBI investigation would do it. So, in the summer of 2016 Steele briefed the FBI on his report. The FBI began obtaining warrants based on the phony claims in the dossier.

The CIA briefed Harry Reid and other Democrat politicians who reliably began talking up the Russia hack meme. Shortly before the election, when DNC funding ended, Comey’s FBI offered to pay Steele to continue his reporting. However, when details of the dossier began to leak to the public, the FBI decided against the arrangement.

“Maverick” GOP Senator McCain delivered a copy of the Steele Dossier to the FBI in December 2016, but they already possessed it. And still no major media outlet  would publish it in all its salacious glory. So on January 6, 2017, intelligence agency heads John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey conducted a formal intelligence briefing with President-elect Trump.

After the formal briefing, FBI Director Comey privately notified Trump of the allegations in the Steele Dossier. Minutes later, the subject of the meeting – the Steele Dossier – leaked!

There were only two people in the meeting: Trump and Comey. Whose side leaked it? (If you can’t figure this out, you’re a Democrat.)

Purposeful Leaks Achieved Specific Goals

  • The leak of the Steele Dossier briefing enabled the colluding Democrat media to report the salacious allegations without attaching itself directly to the demented document. The existence of an FBI investigation into the dossier’s allegations lent credibility to the allegations, and provided the pretext for the media to cover it. Mr. Steele finally got a date to the prom!
  • The Comey leak of a memo regarding a prior meeting with Trump led directly to the appointment of the special prosecutor, who turned out to be Comey’s friend and mentor Robert Mueller.

Glenn Simpson’s Personal Anti-Trump Jihad Served Hillary’s Campaign

Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson personally approached Hillary donors with an offer to smear Donald Trump with fraudulent Trump-Russia collusion “research.” Simpson, a hyper-partisan Democrat smear merchant, experienced a deranged anxiety over the prospect of a Trump presidency.

Simpson recruited Steele and repeatedly encouraged him to shop the dossier to the media. The DNC funded Steele and Fusion GPS through its legal team at Perkins Coie.

Perhaps the most amazing aspect of Steele’s work is the incredible timeliness of his initial report. Hired on June 17, 2016, within just three days Steele somehow managed to unearth multiple talkative sources within the highest levels of the Kremlin, including close Putin associates. And he never left London!

James Comey elevated the relevance of the Steele Dossier by unquestioningly accepting its corrupt premise. The FBI apparently used the dossier’s allegations to obtain warrants against Trump associates. The dossier served as the impetus for the expansion of the Russian collusion investigation with the appointment of Comey’s friend Robert Mueller as special prosecutor.

The Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theory is a wholly-owned operation of the DNC, the Hillary Clinton campaign, its allies within Obama’s intelligence agencies and a crusading, smear-spreading anti-Trump zealot.

Reviewing The DNC Trump Russia Collusion Drama

by

No Donald Trump in this Playbill

Cast of characters from DNC central casting; plot from Hillary’s hoohoo

The DNC Trump Russia Collusion drama is a deranged theatrical production. The various episodes essentially comprise just one grand scandal: The Democrat Party’s deceptive conspiracy to malign candidate Trump and his subsequent administration.

Each episode and all the characters move inexorably down the same plot line. It all comes together with the realization that Hillary Clinton, the Obama intelligence agencies and the DNC manufactured the whole thing. Every episode is a fiction.

The whole mentally abusive narrative comes into focus when you understand the following:

  • The e-mails and other information leaked from the DNC database exposed devastating instances of corruption and the contemptuous attitude of DNC leaders toward its voters.
  • The leaked material made its way to Wikileaks through a source within the DNC; not through a Russian government hacking operation. This has been proved by VIPS, an association of veteran intelligence officials who examined the metadata in the leaked material.
  • To deflect from the contents of the revelations, the DNC contrived the Russia Hack narrative. The FBI, Obama’s intelligence agencies and the media obligingly forwarded the fraudulent narrative.
  • The alleged Russian hacker, Guccifer 2.0, is a fictional character conjured by Democrat Party operatives on the day of the leaked material’s release.
  • Rogue DNC IT staffer Imran Awan had access to the databases of the DNC and 80 House Democrats for years prior to the leak. Arrested for bank fraud and defended by DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, he is suspected of selling confidential information to foreign governments. (If you’re not getting suspicious now, you’re a Democrat.)
  • Wikileaks founder Julian Assange steadfastly denies that the material he released originated from the Russian government. After DNC staffer Seth Rich’s murder on a Washington DC street 10 days before Wikileaks’ first release, Assange offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the culprit. DNC Chair Donna Brazile states that Hillary Clinton declined to offer a reward also.
  • Neither the FBI nor the private cyber security firms hired by the DNC offer any physical evidence that the Russian government hacked the damning material. An independent analysis showed that the original leaked e-mails and reports were doctored to include information which falsely attributed the documents to a Russian source.
  • The DNC bankrolled multiple layers of law firms and public relations hacks to produce the preposterous Steele Dossier. Fusion GPS, the hyper-partisan Democrat Party hit squad that hired Christopher Steele, specializes in astroturf campaigns on behalf of such clients as Planned Parenthood and the governments of Venezuela and Russia.
  • The FBI likely used discredited, unverified allegations in the Steele Dossier to obtain warrants against Trump associates slandered in the dossier.
  • Here is the sole intent of the Steele Dossier: To provide the basis for an FBI investigation into Trump’s campaign.
  • Fusion’s founder Glenn Simpson personally lobbied Democrat donors to fund his investigation of the Russian collusion conspiracy. Vanity Fair reports that the Trump-hating partisan had “grown deeply concerned by the prospect of a Trump presidency.“

The early timeline of the DNC Russia Hack narrative supports a conclusion that a concerted effort by Democrat officials, the Obama government and paid, partisan private organizations concocted the whole scheme:

  • April 2016: DNC suspects its servers had been breached.
    • Yeesh. Are we supposed to forget that Pakistani cyber-criminal Imran Awan had complete access to the DNC servers as well as those of 80 House Democrats?
  • May 5, 2016: Cyber security firm Crowdstrike tells DNC its examination shows evidence of a Russian hack.
    • The DNC blocked the FBI from examining its servers.The FBI did not object. This is the same FBI that forcefully raided Trump associate Paul Manafort’s personal home and absconded with all his computers, in an investigation with no national security implications whatsoever.
  • June 3, 2016: An acquaintance of Donald Trump, Jr. comes out of nowhere to arrange a meeting between Trump Jr. and a Russian attorney currently working with Fusion GPS.
  • June 9, 2016: The Russian attorney, Natasha Veselnitskaya, first meets with Fusion head Glenn Simpson and then with Trump Jr., and then with Simpson again.
    • She does not work for the Russian government, and she has no information about the Clinton campaign.
  • June 12, 2016: Wikileaks announces its imminent release of documents related to the Clinton campaign.
  • June 14, 2016: Crowdstrike publicly announces its conclusion that the Russian government hacked the DNC servers. Its assertion is heavily criticized by cyber security experts as lacking any evidence linking the hack to any Russian agencies. The DNC points the media away from its salacious documents by stating that the hack featured an anti-Trump opposition research document.
  • June 15, 2016: The fictional creature Guccifer 2.0 emerges on the internet with – you guessed it – an anti-Trump opposition research document.
    • Veteran intelligence agents determined that the document contained doctored metadata inserted to falsely attribute its origin to Russia.
  • June 17, 2016: Fusion GPS hires former British MI6 officer Christopher Steele, instructing him specifically to find information connecting the Trump campaign with the Russian government.
  • June 20, 2016: Miraculously, in just three days, 7 high-level sources, including senior Kremlin officials, had laid bare the inner workings of Russia’s vast intelligence apparatus, confiding in Steele the sinister details of perhaps the greatest plot in the history of Russian-American espionage. And we’re supposed to believe that Steele accomplished this historical feat without ever leaving his London offices.
    • The Steele Dossier detailed numerous incredible accounts of Trump’s supposed 5-year-long collusion with Kremlin officials, dating back to when he was a TV star! The report includes the salacious accusation that Trump hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed in a Moscow hotel.
    • Steele has not been to Russia in years, and he never communicated directly with his stated sources. He actually paid intermediaries who promised to communicate with the sources. He admits that none of the information was verified.
  • July 5, 2016: The DNC-contrived fictional character Guccifer 2.0 announces a new hack of the DNC server. Veteran intelligence agents who examined the details of the claim determined that there was no remote hack at all. The information was uploaded to a portable memory device by a person with physical access to the DNC’s server.
    • The media continued to slavishly report that the Russian government remotely executed the data transfer.
  • July 10, 2016: DNC Staffer Seth Rich is murdered at 4 AM on a Washington DC street. Nothing was stolen.
    • Donna Brazile writes that the murder so unnerved her that she began closing the blinds in her office out of fear.
  • July 22, 2016: Wikileaks begins publishing truly damaging DNC documents, as opposed to the bland Guccifer 2.0 releases which emphasized anti-Trump research and decade-old DNC donor lists.
  • July 24, 2016: DNC Chair Wasserman Schultz resigns.
  • August 9, 2016: Wikileaks offers a $20,000 reward for information on the Seth Rich murder. This is $20,000 more than the DNC offered.

Throughout the summer and early fall of 2016, Steele shopped the dossier around to various media outlets, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Yahoo News and The New Yorker. He did so at the urging of Fusion GPS.

The media made a few veiled references to allegations in the dossier, but balked at publishing the whole stinking script because it was clearly a festering cesspool of demented bullcrap.

What’s a conniving, lie-peddling former British spy to do?

The media’s reluctance to attach itself to Steele’s handiwork was not a problem. Between Guccifer, Crowdstrike and every lying Democrat on Capitol Hill, the press already had enough bogus material to advance the Russia Hack fantasy.

Remember, the aim of the Steele Dossier was to provide a basis for the FBI to investigate Trump. Accordingly, Steele pitched the dossier to Obama administration intelligence officials and the reliably gullible “maverick” GOP Senator John McCain, who obligingly hand-delivered a copy to the FBI.

The FBI treated the obviously fraudulent allegations the way it treated the other million fraudulent allegations it receives.

Actually, it didn’t.

It opened up a full-blown surveillance operation against the Trump campaign, and made sure to brief blowhard Democrat senators like Harry Reid about it. Reid played his part by making public accusations that the FBI possessed “explosive” information about the DNC Trump Russia Collusion Drama.

Now the Times, the Post and CNN could report on an FBI investigation without attaching themselves personally to the source of the putrid script.

The Plot Sickens

An unexpected event causes a rewrite of the original script

When the crying began after Trump’s unforeseen victory, the DNC, Obama’s crooked intelligence chiefs and their media lackeys shifted the focus from preventing Trump’s election to delegitimizing the incoming administration.

Armed with warrants procured with scurrilous claims from the Steele Dossier, Obama’s lame duck administration scrutinized every movement of persons associated with Trump.

On January 3, 2017, AG Loretta Lynch authorized the NSA to disseminate raw intelligence data to all other intelligence agencies before “masking”, or concealing the names of American citizens incidentally tracked in a surveillance. The New York Times reported that the new rule facilitated the furious pace of the dissemination of Trump-related information in Obama’s final weeks in office.

On January 6, 2017, the FBI briefed President-elect Trump about the allegations in the Steele Dossier. The briefing immediately leaked to the press. Mission accomplished! By January 10, Buzzfeed, CNN and the rest of the Democrat media aired wall-to-wall coverage of the subject of the briefing.

The leak was the first of two leaks which Comey and associates used to achieve a desired result. In May 2017, Comey leaked a memo he wrote about a meeting with Trump as a prod to spur the appointment of a special prosecutor in the Russian collusion case. That worked, too.

The only possible conclusion

The DNC wrote the Trump Russia Collusion script to deflect from the damage that the imminent release of their internal communications was sure to inflict. When the narrative failed to prevent Trump from gaining the presidency, they accelerated the fiction in a deranged attempt to nullify the election.

The only possible solution

Stop voting for Democrats.

DNC Hack Is Fake News

by

Russia Hack theory ignores evidence of internal leak

Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile claims that Debbie Wasserman Schultz hid her knowledge of the alleged DNC hack for over a month before alerting other party officials. If this doesn’t put the lie to the theory that Russia gave the e-mails to Wikileaks, then nothing will.

In April 2016, the FBI alerted Wasserman Schultz that the DNC servers had been breached. Curiously, the DNC Chair declined the FBI’s “offer” to investigate the matter. (Since when does the FBI “offer” to help investigate a matter of national security?)

Wasserman Schultz knew that the leaker resided in her own organization. Chances are, Comey’s FBI did, too.

Jailed Wasserman Shultz IT Aide Awan Had Access To DNC Server

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ((D-FL) and 80 other House Democrats employed corrupt Pakastani native Imran Awan as their IT specialist. This is because hiring an honest American adds nothing to the progressives’ rich multicultural tapestry.

At the time of the DNC hack, Awan had access to the DNC server, courtesy of Wasserman Schultz. Circa News reported in September that Awan uploaded massive amounts of data – terabits – from the DNC server to his private Dropbox account. He is under investigation for allegations of selling information to foreign governments.

On February 2, 2017, the FBI and the Capitol Police launched an investigation of Awan relating to cyber crimes. Most Democrats then released Awan from IT duties, but Schultz kept him on until July 26 – the day after the FBI arrested him for bank fraud and 3 other charges. The Capitol Police have taken possession of several of Awan’s computers. In May 2017, Schultz threatened a Capitol Police Chief with “consequences” unless he returned the equipment.

Schultz’s loyalty to Awan seems baffling, considering his mind-numbing record. In addition to illicitly uploading terabits of DNC files, he illegally accessed congressional servers 5,400 times; he manipulated the terms of a $50,000 life insurance policy meant for his stepmother, who states he illegally confines and threatens her; he defaulted on a $100,000 “loan” from an Iranian fugitive tied to terror organization Hezbollah; he has two wives, one of whom told police he keeps her in a house in Virginia as a slave; he has made millions working for Democrat staffers, and wired $293,000 to Pakistan the week of his arrest. Oh, and he’s in the country as a winner in Chuck Schumer’s glorious Diversity Lottery immigration scam!

Wasserman Schultz even trotted out the “Islamophobia” accusation against this miscreant’s detractors. She really really really really really doesn’t want you to know about her IT cyber-fraudster. She wants you to know about “Russia.”

Investigation proves July 2016 DNC hack was an inside job

A group of 30 former top security experts from the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies, formed a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). They examined the evidence in this case and concluded that the July 2016 DNC hack originated on-site, perpetrated by someone with physical access to DNC servers. Democrat officials continue to blame this and previous breaches on Russia, without citing any factual evidence. The Nation quoted the VIPS report in its analysis:

  • There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
  • Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

VIPS based its conclusions on physical science. The metadata of the leaked material, examined by an intelligence source working with VIPS, demonstrates that the data transfer could not possibly have taken place over the internet. In the transfer, 1,976 megabytes were downloaded from the DNC server in 87 seconds. This transfer rate, 22.7 megabytes per second, lies beyond the capability of current internet technologies. A simple thumb drive, however, achieves precisely this rate.

The theory that Russian intelligence executed this hack collapses under the weight of scientific evidence.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange hints about leaker’s identity

Five days after the July 5 data breach, DNC Director of Voter Expansion Seth Rich was murdered after midnight on the street in his Washington, DC neighborhood. Shot several times, the perpetrator stole none of the items of value found on his person, including a wallet, watch and jewelry.

Wikileaks released its batch of DNC e-mails on July 22, 2016. On August 9, Julian Assange posted a $20,000 reward for information leading to the murderer of Seth Rich. Assange cryptically stated. “I’m suggesting our sources take risks.” Investigators do not know if Seth Rich was connected with the leaks in any way.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz rejected the FBI’s assistance in finding the DNC hacker because she knew the leaks were internal. The threat to national security didn’t move the FBI to demand access to the computers in question. The Russia Hack theory is a baseless fabrication of the Democrat Party, the media, and their allies in Obama’s government.

 

 

DNC and Fusion GPS Push Steele Dossier Disinformation Campaign

by

Steele Dossier Is Classic Soviet-Style Disinformation

If the DNC had published the ridiculous accusations in the Steele Dossier on its own, people might be skeptical. Well, people who don’t work for CNN, anyway. So, having learned at the feet of their communist masters, the DNC peddled their handiwork to the Democrat-loving media and Obama’s FBI. Then, they sat back, watched their baby grow, and denied having played any part in the whole fantasy. Today, mainstream media consumers are shocked – just shocked – to learn that the Steele Dossier is a $12 million concoction of the Democrat Party itself.

Disinformation 101

In the book Disinformation, Lt. General Ion Pacepa describes how Soviet propagandists made the general public believe ridiculous things. As the top intelligence officer of Romania for decades during the Soviet era, he took part in high-level Kremlin operations to convince gullible westerners to believe fictional accounts that were damaging to the United States and its allies. The key to these disinformation campaigns was for Soviet bloc propagandists to dupe trusted western media sources to report manufactured tales, rather than making the accusations public themselves. This gave credibility to reports that would be laughed off coming straight from the Soviet agencies.

In the case of the Steele Dossier, the DNC played the part of the Soviet disinformation agents. CNN, the New York Times and the rest of the Democrat media played their part just as they had in the past: They published the damaging account with no mention of its clear partisan origin. Don’t shoot the messenger!

The fiction writers of the modern Democrat Party invented a salacious account of Donald Trump hiring hookers to urinate on a bed once used by Barack Obama. They added further details less lurid but just as unfounded. They then hired multiple levels of lawyers and private, dependable Democrat political firms to peddle the disinformation to the media and to James Comey’s FBI. It worked.

On the night of January 10, 2017, CNN ran 12 solid hours of breathless reporting on the made-up accusations in the Steele Dossier. By the afternoon of January 11, every fair-minded American knew the allegations to be false, but every devoted viewer of CNN and its mainstream media allies believed the lies. Mission accomplished.

In the 1930s, the New York Times helped Soviet propagandists convince Americans that the reports of Stalin’s atrocities in Ukraine and Moscow were untrue. In the 1950s, the Democrat media convinced westerners that the sainted anti-communist Pope Pius XII was a Nazi sympathizer. In 1959, Times reporter Herbert Matthews single-handedly turned western public opinion in favor of the brutal Fidel Castro and his psychotic sidekick Che Guevara. Modern dupes still believe the J. Edgar Hoover cross-dressing fantasies pushed by Cold War era media dupes.

Soviet-style disinformation is alive and well in today’s Democrat Party and its obedient press. General Pacepa couldn’t have done it better himself.

 

Top 10 Reasons Putin Wanted Trump To Lose To Hillary Clinton

by

Putin wanted Trump to lose. Here’s why:

(1)  Blackmail Bonanza

  • The Russian hack of Hillary’s private server gave Putin the mother lode of material with which to blackmail the U.S. in the event of a Clinton win. Alas, the 30,000 “missing” e-mails in Vlad’s possession left him with a pyrrhic victory when his gal lost.

(2)  Hillary Clinton’s Proven Corruptibility

  • As Secretary of State, Clinton signed off on Russia’s acquisition of 20% of U.S. uranium supplies in exchange for $140 million in Clinton Foundation donations, and a $500,000 gift for Bill. Seems strange that the Russians would throw such wealth at a candidate they allegedly opposed.
  • John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager, sat alongside two Russian oligarchs on the board of Joule Energy, which received $35 million from the state-owned Russian bank Sberbank. Podesta’s brother is that bank’s lobbyist. Joule Energy has raised $200 million from “investors” but produces no product. The oligarchs on Joule’s board were personal associates of Putin.
    • John Podesta did not disclose his involvement with the Russian government as required when he joined the Obama administration as senior advisor. And then Hillary made Podesta her campaign manager. And then she lost. And then she blamed Putin, whose personal friends used the Russian Central Bank to make her campaign manager rich. Easy!

(3)  Trump’s Energy Policy A Mortal Threat To Russian Economy

(4)  Trump Will Rebuild The Military That Hillary’s Party Decimated

  • Donald Trump’s plan to revitalize the American military cannot be welcome news to a country once brought down by the Reagan-era build-up. Surely, Vladimir was not anxious to see the modernization of America’s nuclear arsenal and naval fleet. Hillary’s party diminished U.S. nuclear superiority with the START Treaty, and promised to reduce nuclear assets 33% below even the new pro-Russian quotas.

(5)  Democrat Policies Strengthened Russia’s Allies, Increased Its Influence

(6)  Hillary’s Policies Emboldened Russian Advances In Eastern Europe

  • As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton took part in the decision to abandon the Eastern European missile defense shield promised by the previous Republican administration. U.S. allies objected, but The New York Times reported that Russian President Medvedev stated, “We appreciate the responsible approach.” Sure he did!
  • After signalling surrender to Russian interests with the missile shield and START debacles, Hillary’s Democrats stood by as an emboldened Russia annexed Crimea and instigated unrest in Ukraine. As Reuters now reports, President Trump immediately pushed back on Russia’s Obama-era aggression in Eastern Europe.

(7)  Hillary Directed The Transfer of American Weapons Technology To Russia

  • In 2010, Secretary Clinton assisted Russian President Medvedev in his “Go Russia!” campaign to create a Russian Silicon Valley-type technology enclave in Skolkovo, outside Moscow. The initiative contributed to Russian advances in weapons technology like hypersonic missiles. Hillary personally lobbied for the project with dozens of American technology firms which then contributed up to $23 million to the Clinton Foundation.
    • So far, no leak has surfaced confirming that Hillary’s office sported a “Go Russia!” promotional poster next to the one of Che Guevara.

(8)  Hillary’s “Reset”,  Anti-Terror Bungles And Other American Betrayals

  • The Democrats’ Pro-Russian tendencies were demonstrated to Putin well before Obama’s pledge of further missile-defense concessions to outgoing President Medvedev was caught on an open mic. But now even New York Times readers heard about it.
  • Russian intelligence officials warned on several occasions that Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a security threat, but even after his terror-training trip to Dagestan, Obama’s national security team took no action. Putin must have gotten a good laugh out of the administration’s claim that Tsarnaev escaped detection due to a misspelling in a single database.
  • Eager to press forward on the “Russian Reset”, Hillary and the Democrats hid from congressional committees their knowledge of Russian violations of the INF nuclear missile treaty, in order to secure passage of the pro-Russia START Treaty.

(9)  Democrats’ Historic Affinity To Russia Contrasts With Republican Opposition To Kremlin Goals

  • Hillary’s party worked clandestinely to undermine President Reagan’s ultimately successful policy to cripple the Soviet economy through an aggressive defense build-up, similar to that proposed by Trump. In 1983, Senator Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov offering to help undermine Reagan’s policy in exchange for Soviet help in Kennedy’s Presidential bid of 1984.
    • Hillary had conspired with Senator Kennedy’s staff in 1974, when, as a Watergate Committee staffer, she concealed documents in an attempt to deprive Richard Nixon of legal counsel in the impeachment investigation.
  • Hillary’s rival in the 2016 Democrat primary, Bernie Sanders, was so enamored with the Soviet Union that he went there on his honeymoon.

(10)  Hillary’s Party Released Russian Spies and American Traitors

  • In 2010, when the FBI arrested a Russian spy ring which had infiltrated Hillary’s circle of friends, her State Department arranged a prisoner swap in which all of the Russian spies were deported without prosecution. The prisoner exchange occurred a mere 2 weeks after the arrests, setting a record for this type of negotiation, which normally takes years. Unbelievably, no Americans were released in the “swap” because Russia released Russians too!
  • Days before leaving office in 2017, Democrat President Obama commuted the sentence of Bradley (Chelsea) Manning, who had committed one of the most damaging security breaches in American history. The release of detailed plans of American military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan undoubtedly cost American lives. If Putin needed proof of which party he could trust to betray American interests, this was it.

Putin wanted Trump to lose because he wanted America to lose.

Mueller Probe of Russian Spy Halted In 2010 On Obama Order; Hillary Implicated

by

Obama Whisked Russian Spy Out of Country After Arrest

FBI Director Robert Mueller’s 10-Year Investigation Squashed By Attorney General Eric Holder

In June of 2010, in another Mueller probe into Kremlin mischief, the FBI arrested a Russian spy who infiltrated Hillary Clinton’s inner circle by attaching herself to a close friend of the Secretary of State. Cynthia Murphy provided financial services to Clinton associate Alan Patricof, the Russian-American who served as finance chairman for Hillary Clinton’s run for the U.S. Senate. Patricof notified Hillary aide Huma Abedin when he learned of the investigation.

Within 2 weeks of the arrests of Murphy and 9 other spies, Obama closed the investigation and sent the operatives back to Russia without obtaining further information from them. The move limited damage to Hillary Clinton’s political aspirations.

The FBI Director at the time was Robert Mueller, recently appointed as Special Counsel in the manufactured Trump-Russia probe.

FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi explained the objectives of the Kremlin-directed operation: to collect information helpful to Moscow by blending spies into American governmental and academic institutions. According to The Washington Times,

the spy ring’s reports to Moscow revealed that the group was providing important data on the international gold markets, U.S. foreign policy toward Russia and Asia, and the identities of people applying for positions at the CIA.

Instead of prosecuting the suspects, or even interrogating them to gain intelligence, the Obama administration hastily arranged a prisoner swap to whisk the spies out of the country. Normally, prisoner swaps take years of intense negotiations, but this one took 2 weeks.

Amazingly, the prisoners released by the Russians were not Americans. They were themselves Russians, accused by Russia of being American spies. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had arranged a Russian-American prisoner swap where both sides released Russians.

The furious effort to release the Russians contrasted starkly with the administration’s refusal to help actual Americans unlawfully detained in Iran, Portugal, and Mexico. Unfortunately for those detainees, their release could not be linked to a political goal of the President or Secretary of State.

The Guardian reported that “the case was brought to a swift conclusion before it could complicate the president’s campaign to ‘reset’ US relations with Russia.”

Obama feared spies would leave on their own, then released them

Obama Attorney General Eric Holder stated that he ordered the spies’ arrests because he feared that they would leave the country. And then he escorted them out of the country!

Holder stated, “This was an extraordinary case, developed through years of work by investigators, intelligence lawyers, and prosecutors.” And when evidence pointed to Hillary Clinton, he released the spies in record time!

The Washington Post described the damage inflicted by the deal:

“One thing that makes it harder to recruit people for work like this is the prospect you’re going to be in a world of hurt if you get caught. If the worst you have to worry about is the American government’s catch-and-release policy, what kind of deterrent is that?” said Stephen Sestanovich, a Russia expert who has worked for both Republican and Democratic administrations.

John L. Martin, who supervised dozens of espionage cases during a 26-year career at the Justice Department, said earlier spy exchanges took years to work out. The speed at which the latest one occurred was “absolutely unprecedented,” he said.

Indeed, the swap could feed Republican criticism that the Obama administration is too accommodating toward Russia.

How are we supposed to believe that Russia wanted this bunch of weaklings to lose the election? It’s absurd.

Spy Release Part of Obama-Clinton Policy of Early-Often Surrender

The timing of the arrests and quick release of the Russian spies was curious. Just 3 days before the arrests, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev met with Obama and Secretary Clinton at the White House. It was Obama’s seventh meeting with Medvedev in 17 months, and not a single memo was ever leaked to The New York Times!

The Times reported that the parties discussed economic policy; that is, when they weren’t discussing ways to undermine FBI investigations uncovering Russian spies working for Hillary Clinton’s friends. Days before, The Times reports, Medvedev visited California to sell Silicon Valley executives on his own technology venture in Skolkovo.

The Skolkovo venture, promoted by Hillary Clinton, turned out to be a front for the Russian military. It resulted in Russia gaining classified American technology relating to advanced weapons systems. The Clinton Foundation received up to $23 million in donations from the firms that Hillary lured to Skolkovo.

The constant early contact between the Obama White House and the Kremlin had resulted in major gains for the Russians, and nothing but abject surrender for the Americans. Yet The Times and its Democrat allies saw nothing of a conspiratorial nature in the whole humiliating episode. It cheerily reported that after a 105-minute phone call with Obama, Medvedev quipped, “The ear starts getting stiff.” That’s one conversation we don’t want the NSA to release.

Of course, this unbroken early string of American concessions only set the table for more concessions later. While discussing missile defense in March 2012, Obama was caught on an open mic telling Medvedev, “I have more flexibility after the election.” He was telling the Russian President that American voters disliked American Presidents surrendering to Russia, so he was waiting until after the election to surrender.

Mueller And The Release of the Russian Spies

It’s a sure bet that the Democrat media have no interest in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s experience as the FBI Director who was ordered by Obama to end a 10-year investigation that uncovered actual Russian espionage. Until this week, they apparently had no idea that presidents could even offer opinions to the FBI.

Mueller can shed some light about which party conspired to excuse Russian espionage, and which candidate had a personal interest in making the matter go away. Of course, The Times and The Washington Post don’t seem to have much of a nose for news when the news isn’t good for the Democrats. But the internet is a terrible thing, and they wrote all about it in 2010. They just need to be reminded.

Trump Leak To Lavrov Was Old News, Except To Washington Post Readers

by

Post Hides Behind Anonymous Source In Trump Leak Scoop

The breathless report in The Washington Post about the Trump leak to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov actually revealed information that was publicly known months before. The Daily Beast reported in March that the American raid in Yemen in February yielded information about terrorists using bombs in laptop batteries in plots to blow up airliners. The Washington Post had previously sided with Yemeni sources over U.S. military officials in claiming the raid was unsuccessful.

If Russia has access to the internet, Lavrov could have read public reports that proved the value of the intelligence that The Post alleges he only learned about at the recent White House meeting.

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster denied that any classified intelligence sources were divulged to Russia during the meeting. The meeting was attended only by Trump, McMaster and a small circle of Trump officials and the Russian officials. The Post, as usual, cites only “former U.S. intelligence” officials. That means Obama hacks, who continue to collude with the Democrat media to promote the absurd Russia Hack meme.

The Post is “withholding most plot details” because it wants to keep its readers in the dark about information that everyone else in the world knew about 6 weeks ago.

The Russia Hack meme is a fraud.

Leave a comment:

    Debunking The Russia Hack Meme

    by

    Russia Hack: If Putin wanted Hillary to lose, we have nothing to worry about. Because that would mean he’s an idiot.

    The Russia Hack meme is a steaming pile of horse manure. It doesn’t pass the smell test.

    Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration were Russia’s greatest allies since the basketball referees at the 1972 Olympics. During their tenure (known as “the Hay Day” in the Kremlin), America surrendered much of its nuclear superiority, technological advantages in advanced military weapons systems, and strategic influence in the Middle East and Europe. Our allies were confused and weakened, while Russia used its newfound influence to benefit its own allies. (What a concept!) 

    Consider just this episode: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama signed off on the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium assets to the official, state owned Russian atomic energy agency. The company which sold the uranium mines made a fortune, and its officers and affiliates donated $140 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton is a close associate of the Canadian financier who made the deal happen, and Bill was instrumental in making the foreign connections that got the ball rolling.

    Hillary’s reset was really a surrender to Russian demands at the expense of her own country’s strategic interests. Russia did the ground-and-pound on Uncle Sam in the START Treaty negotiations, in the uranium deal, and in Secretary Clinton’s initiative to transfer American technological advantages to Russia’s own fledgling Silicon Valley at Skolkovo, outside Moscow.

    Unless Vladimir Putin is a traitor to Mother Russia, or a moron, it is inconceivable that he would want Hillary’s party to get off the mat and hand things over to an exuberantly patriotic, military-supporting, capitalist champion of American business interests. Not to mention, one whose fossil fuel-based energy policy has the potential to devastate Putin’s economy by sending massive amounts of cheap American natural gas to Russia’s currently captive market.

    The Russia Hack meme is a fraud, conceived and cultivated by a defeated party and its media zombies in the wake of a well-earned spanking. Aghast at the prospect of losing its ability to turn America into a progressive hellhole, the Democrat Party broke its 99-year romance with Lenin’s party and blamed them for the breakup.

    Every accusation has been a laughable lie if you only remember how Hillary’s Democrats prostrated themselves before Russia for 8 years. You cannot think Putin would actually prefer Trump over Hillary, unless you think maybe he was intimidated by her Chairman Mao pant suits.

    And what’s the scandal, anyway? One or two Trump people were among the thousand or so politicians in DC who talked to Russians last year? So what? This is not an investigation to find a criminal. This is an investigation to find a crime!

    Leave a comment:

      Who Would Russia Prefer: Trump or Hillary?

      by

      Who Would Putin Prefer? Not A Tough Choice

      Russia Hack Mao
      “Comrades!”

      Russia Hack Hillary
      “Comrades!”

      Russia Hack Putin
      “What’s not to like?”

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Vladimir Putin and Russia have one objective regardless of who sits in the Oval Office: to promote the interests of Russia by destabilizing and weakening the American government. They’ve pursued this objective through 100 years of Republican and Democrat presidents.

      That being said, if Putin had to choose between the America First and the America Surrender candidate, it is irrational to believe he would choose Donald Trump, the America First candidate.

      • Donald Trump promised a strong America, militarily and economically. Hillary Clinton demonstrated the opposite.
      • Donald Trump promised to support our allies, like Israel and el-Sisi’s Egypt, and oppose our adversaries, like Russian allies Iran and Syria. Hillary demonstrated the opposite.
      • Donald Trump promised an energy policy emphasizing America’s cheap, abundant energy resources, to lower energy costs and stimulate industrial growth, all the while undercutting the one-dimensional Russian economy’s major source of revenue: fossil fuel exports. Hillary Clinton’s green energy fantasy failed under Obama and in every country that tried it, devastating economies and impoverishing populations across the globe. And she promised more of this. That’s GOOD for Russia.

      Given that Russia’s known objective is to weaken America, it really wasn’t that tough a choice, was it, Vlad?

      National Defense

      Energy

      Leave a comment:

        Russia Hack – Democrat Party Empowers Russia In Europe, Middle East

        by

        Hillary, Obama Abandon U.S. Allies, Strengthen Russia

        If you’re in full possession of your faculties and find it hard to believe that Vladimir Putin preferred the America First Candidate over the Surrender Candidate in the 2016 election, the following won’t make it any easier:

        • In September 2009, on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland, Secretary Clinton’s party announced the abandonment of the planned anti-ballistic missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic. U.S. allies vehemently objected, while Putin pronounced the move as “right and brave.”
          • In March 2013, the Democrats abandoned an alternate plan to defend our Eastern European allies, declining to place land-based interceptors in the region.
        • In April 2010, Secretary Clinton negotiated a virtual American surrender in the START Treaty agreement. The treaty allowed Russia to build new, modern weapons, while forcing the U.S. to destroy existing stock. It scrapped the monitoring and inspection programs in the original agreement. It allowed Russia to unilaterally set the number of warheads both countries can maintain, and set a level playing field even though U.S. allies across the globe depend on American protection, while Russia merely needs to protect itself. It allowed Russia to maintain its ten-to-one numerical advantage in tactical nuclear weapons.
          • In 2014, Obama announced his intention to unilaterally reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal 33% below the levels agreed upon in the START Treaty.
        • Hillary’s Democrats repeatedly bowed to Russia in Syria, allowing Russia to prop up its ally Assad, shunning even the warning of The Washington Post to refrain from abandoning the Syrian crisis to Putin.
        • Hillary’s Democrats bungled Iraq so badly that Russian ally and American enemy Iran was allowed to send troops to gain a foothold in Iraq, in areas that the U.S. had already stabilized in the successful Iraq War before Obama abandoned our Iraqi partners.
        • In 2005, Senator Obama persuaded Ukraine that Russia presented no threat, and secured funding for Ukraine to destroy or export tons of ammunition, artillery and missiles which were sorely needed when Russia subsequently annexed Crimea in the Ukrainian peninsula, and then mounted armed incursions into eastern Ukraine. As President, Democrat Obama then refused Ukraine’s plea for weapons support, instead offering to send MREs, military food provisions, the same support he offered the Free Syrian Army we had pledged to help. And he even failed to deliver on those meager offers.
        • As a direct result of Obama’s Iran nuclear deal in 2015, Russia announced an $800 million deal to supply its ally Iran with the S300 missile, whose sole purpose is to shoot any American or American ally missile out of the sky. In 2010, before Hillary’s Democrats obliterated the sanctions program, Russia had cancelled the missile deal under international pressure. After receiving $1.7 billion from Obama, Iran – the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism – increased its military budget by 145%.

        Does anybody really believe that Putin would influence the American election to remove these Democrats from power?

        Leave a comment:

          Russia Hack: In Skolkovo, Hillary Trades US Technology To Russia For Millions In Foundation Donations

          by

          If Putin had blocked Hillary’s path to the White House after the Skolkovo caper, his comrades would have tossed him into the Volgograd

          In September 2009, Russia announced plans to create its own Silicon Valley at a research facility named Skolkovo. The initiative, titled “Go Russia!”,  was promoted as a means of advancing Russian commercial technology by partnering with private international technology companies. In reality, as a 2014 FBI investigation found, the project was a successful effort to import classified U.S. technology to advance Russian military aims. The Russian military co-opted the program to gain sensitive technology programs to nullify U.S. superiority in weapons systems like hypersonic missiles and advanced radar. And the name of the American who willingly facilitated the transfer was not Donald Trump, but Hillary Clinton.

          Secretary Clinton recruited more than 20 U.S. companies, including Cisco, Microsoft, Boeing, GE and Google, to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the Russian operation. The companies then donated up to $23 million to the Clinton Foundation.

          One of the companies that assisted Russia was Joule Energy. One of four Joule board members was John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager for her 2016 presidential bid. Podesta’s company received $35 million from a Russian organization with deep ties to Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin. When Podesta joined the Obama administration as senior advisor in 2013, he failed to disclose his ties to Joule.

          One must ask: Knowing this, why would Vladimir Putin want Hillary Clinton to lose the 2016 election? He can’t even swim!

          Leave a comment:

            Hillary & Obama Gave Russia 20% of U.S. Uranium Assets

            by

            $140M In Clinton Foundation Donations Sealed The Deal

            Ask your local Russia Hack conspiracy theorist why Putin would want the Democrats to lose in 2016, considering the uranium bonanza they gave him. The Clintons and the Obama administration took a series of actions which gave Russia control of 20% of America’s uranium, a strategic asset used to produce nuclear energy and weapons. In exchange for $140 million in donations from Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation, Secretary Clinton approved the sale of the mining company to the official, state-owned Russian atomic agency, Rosatom.  A brief summary:

            • In September 2005, Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra sought access to uranium mines in Kazakhstan. Democrat ex-President Bill Clinton flew in Giustra’s private jet to a meeting Clinton arranged with corrupt Kazakhstan President Nazarbayev. Bill publicly praised the autocrat, and 3 days later Giustra’s company was granted what he wanted: a stake in 3 uranium mines in Kazakhstan.
            • Then, Giustra donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.
            • And then, Giustra pledged an additional $100 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill said, “I love this guy!”
            • In 2007, Giustra’s company, Uranium One, bought uranium mines in 4 U.S. states while its chairman, Ian Telfer, donated $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation.  Giustra sold his personal holdings for $45 million.
            • In 2009, Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State, and the Russian atomic agency, Rosatom, bought 17% interest in Uranium One. Chairman Telfer donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.
            • In June 2010, Rosatom announced a deal to acquire a 51% interest in Uranium One, pending the approval of Secretary of State Clinton. Uranium One and its affiliates had donated $8.6 million to the Clinton Foundation in the past 2 years.
            • On June 29, 2010, in Moscow, Bill Clinton made $500,000 for a speech to a Kremlin-affiliated Russian investment bank promoting Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One.
            • Then, in October 2010, Secretary Clinton and the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment approved Rosatom’s acquisition of a majority interest in Uranium One.
            • By January 2013, through Clinton’s term as Secretary of State, Russian atomic agency Rosatom owned 100% interest in Uranium One, along with its 20% share of American uranium assets. Its chairman, Ian Telfer, had donated $2.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.

            …And Putin wanted Hillary to…lose? What more could Putin ask for? In a headline worthy of The New York Times‘ Walter Duranty, Russian propaganda outlet Pravda proclaimed, “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers The World“. Rosatom head Sergei Kiriyenko rejoiced to Putin, “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20% of U.S. reserves!”

            Read New York Times Story on Putin’s Haul

            Excerpt:

            Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

            If Putin tried to get Hillary and the Democrats to lose the election after this spectacularly successful partnership, he’s either a traitor to Mother Russia or an idiot.

             

             

            Leave a comment: