Skip links

Main navigation

Russia Hack

hillary

DNC Hack Is Fake News

by

Russia Hack theory ignores evidence of internal leak

Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile claims that Debbie Wasserman Schultz hid her knowledge of the alleged DNC hack for over a month before alerting other party officials. If this doesn’t put the lie to the theory that Russia gave the e-mails to Wikileaks, then nothing will.

In April 2016, the FBI alerted Wasserman Schultz that the DNC servers had been breached. Curiously, the DNC Chair declined the FBI’s “offer” to investigate the matter. (Since when does the FBI “offer” to help investigate a matter of national security?)

Wasserman Schultz knew that the leaker resided in her own organization. Chances are, Comey’s FBI did, too.

Jailed Wasserman Shultz IT Aide Awan Had Access To DNC Server

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ((D-FL) and 80 other House Democrats employed corrupt Pakastani native Imran Awan as their IT specialist. This is because hiring an honest American adds nothing to the progressives’ rich multicultural tapestry.

At the time of the DNC hack, Awan had access to the DNC server, courtesy of Wasserman Schultz. Circa News reported in September that Awan uploaded massive amounts of data – terabits – from the DNC server to his private Dropbox account. He is under investigation for allegations of selling information to foreign governments.

On February 2, 2017, the FBI and the Capitol Police launched an investigation of Awan relating to cyber crimes. Most Democrats then released Awan from IT duties, but Schultz kept him on until July 26 – the day after the FBI arrested him for bank fraud and 3 other charges. The Capitol Police have taken possession of several of Awan’s computers. In May 2017, Schultz threatened a Capitol Police Chief with “consequences” unless he returned the equipment.

Schultz’s loyalty to Awan seems baffling, considering his mind-numbing record. In addition to illicitly uploading terabits of DNC files, he illegally accessed congressional servers 5,400 times; he manipulated the terms of a $50,000 life insurance policy meant for his stepmother, who states he illegally confines and threatens her; he defaulted on a $100,000 “loan” from an Iranian fugitive tied to terror organization Hezbollah; he has two wives, one of whom told police he keeps her in a house in Virginia as a slave; he has made millions working for Democrat staffers, and wired $293,000 to Pakistan the week of his arrest. Oh, and he’s in the country as a winner in Chuck Schumer’s glorious Diversity Lottery immigration scam!

Wasserman Schultz even trotted out the “Islamophobia” accusation against this miscreant’s detractors. She really really really really really doesn’t want you to know about her IT cyber-fraudster. She wants you to know about “Russia.”

Investigation proves July 2016 DNC hack was an inside job

A group of 30 former top security experts from the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, and other agencies, formed a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). They examined the evidence in this case and concluded that the July 2016 DNC hack originated on-site, perpetrated by someone with physical access to DNC servers. Democrat officials continue to blame this and previous breaches on Russia, without citing any factual evidence. The Nation quoted the VIPS report in its analysis:

  • There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.
  • Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

VIPS based its conclusions on physical science. The metadata of the leaked material, examined by an intelligence source working with VIPS, demonstrates that the data transfer could not possibly have taken place over the internet. In the transfer, 1,976 megabytes were downloaded from the DNC server in 87 seconds. This transfer rate, 22.7 megabytes per second, lies beyond the capability of current internet technologies. A simple thumb drive, however, achieves precisely this rate.

The theory that Russian intelligence executed this hack collapses under the weight of scientific evidence.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange hints about leaker’s identity

Five days after the July 5 data breach, DNC Director of Voter Expansion Seth Rich was murdered after midnight on the street in his Washington, DC neighborhood. Shot several times, the perpetrator stole none of the items of value found on his person, including a wallet, watch and jewelry.

Wikileaks released its batch of DNC e-mails on July 22, 2016. On August 9, Julian Assange posted a $20,000 reward for information leading to the murderer of Seth Rich. Assange cryptically stated. “I’m suggesting our sources take risks.” Investigators do not know if Seth Rich was connected with the leaks in any way.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz rejected the FBI’s assistance in finding the DNC hacker because she knew the leaks were internal. The threat to national security didn’t move the FBI to demand access to the computers in question. The Russia Hack theory is a baseless fabrication of the Democrat Party, the media, and their allies in Obama’s government.

 

 

Mueller Probe of Russian Spy Halted In 2010 On Obama Order; Hillary Implicated

by

Obama Whisked Russian Spy Out of Country After Arrest

FBI Director Robert Mueller’s 10-Year Investigation Squashed By Attorney General Eric Holder

In June of 2010, in another Mueller probe into Kremlin mischief, the FBI arrested a Russian spy who infiltrated Hillary Clinton’s inner circle by attaching herself to a close friend of the Secretary of State. Cynthia Murphy provided financial services to Clinton associate Alan Patricof, the Russian-American who served as finance chairman for Hillary Clinton’s run for the U.S. Senate. Patricof notified Hillary aide Huma Abedin when he learned of the investigation.

Within 2 weeks of the arrests of Murphy and 9 other spies, Obama closed the investigation and sent the operatives back to Russia without obtaining further information from them. The move limited damage to Hillary Clinton’s political aspirations.

The FBI Director at the time was Robert Mueller, recently appointed as Special Counsel in the manufactured Trump-Russia probe.

FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi explained the objectives of the Kremlin-directed operation: to collect information helpful to Moscow by blending spies into American governmental and academic institutions. According to The Washington Times,

the spy ring’s reports to Moscow revealed that the group was providing important data on the international gold markets, U.S. foreign policy toward Russia and Asia, and the identities of people applying for positions at the CIA.

Instead of prosecuting the suspects, or even interrogating them to gain intelligence, the Obama administration hastily arranged a prisoner swap to whisk the spies out of the country. Normally, prisoner swaps take years of intense negotiations, but this one took 2 weeks.

Amazingly, the prisoners released by the Russians were not Americans. They were themselves Russians, accused by Russia of being American spies. Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had arranged a Russian-American prisoner swap where both sides released Russians.

The furious effort to release the Russians contrasted starkly with the administration’s refusal to help actual Americans unlawfully detained in Iran, Portugal, and Mexico. Unfortunately for those detainees, their release could not be linked to a political goal of the President or Secretary of State.

The Guardian reported that “the case was brought to a swift conclusion before it could complicate the president’s campaign to ‘reset’ US relations with Russia.”

Obama feared spies would leave on their own, then released them

Obama Attorney General Eric Holder stated that he ordered the spies’ arrests because he feared that they would leave the country. And then he escorted them out of the country!

Holder stated, “This was an extraordinary case, developed through years of work by investigators, intelligence lawyers, and prosecutors.” And when evidence pointed to Hillary Clinton, he released the spies in record time!

The Washington Post described the damage inflicted by the deal:

“One thing that makes it harder to recruit people for work like this is the prospect you’re going to be in a world of hurt if you get caught. If the worst you have to worry about is the American government’s catch-and-release policy, what kind of deterrent is that?” said Stephen Sestanovich, a Russia expert who has worked for both Republican and Democratic administrations.

John L. Martin, who supervised dozens of espionage cases during a 26-year career at the Justice Department, said earlier spy exchanges took years to work out. The speed at which the latest one occurred was “absolutely unprecedented,” he said.

Indeed, the swap could feed Republican criticism that the Obama administration is too accommodating toward Russia.

How are we supposed to believe that Russia wanted this bunch of weaklings to lose the election? It’s absurd.

Spy Release Part of Obama-Clinton Policy of Early-Often Surrender

The timing of the arrests and quick release of the Russian spies was curious. Just 3 days before the arrests, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev met with Obama and Secretary Clinton at the White House. It was Obama’s seventh meeting with Medvedev in 17 months, and not a single memo was ever leaked to The New York Times!

The Times reported that the parties discussed economic policy; that is, when they weren’t discussing ways to undermine FBI investigations uncovering Russian spies working for Hillary Clinton’s friends. Days before, The Times reports, Medvedev visited California to sell Silicon Valley executives on his own technology venture in Skolkovo.

The Skolkovo venture, promoted by Hillary Clinton, turned out to be a front for the Russian military. It resulted in Russia gaining classified American technology relating to advanced weapons systems. The Clinton Foundation received up to $23 million in donations from the firms that Hillary lured to Skolkovo.

The constant early contact between the Obama White House and the Kremlin had resulted in major gains for the Russians, and nothing but abject surrender for the Americans. Yet The Times and its Democrat allies saw nothing of a conspiratorial nature in the whole humiliating episode. It cheerily reported that after a 105-minute phone call with Obama, Medvedev quipped, “The ear starts getting stiff.” That’s one conversation we don’t want the NSA to release.

Of course, this unbroken early string of American concessions only set the table for more concessions later. While discussing missile defense in March 2012, Obama was caught on an open mic telling Medvedev, “I have more flexibility after the election.” He was telling the Russian President that American voters disliked American Presidents surrendering to Russia, so he was waiting until after the election to surrender.

Mueller And The Release of the Russian Spies

It’s a sure bet that the Democrat media have no interest in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s experience as the FBI Director who was ordered by Obama to end a 10-year investigation that uncovered actual Russian espionage. Until this week, they apparently had no idea that presidents could even offer opinions to the FBI.

Mueller can shed some light about which party conspired to excuse Russian espionage, and which candidate had a personal interest in making the matter go away. Of course, The Times and The Washington Post don’t seem to have much of a nose for news when the news isn’t good for the Democrats. But the internet is a terrible thing, and they wrote all about it in 2010. They just need to be reminded.